The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 23, Issue 1 , Pages 51-56, January 2008

The Influence of Acetabular Component Position on Wear in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Arthritis Institute, Inglewood, California 90301

Received 5 December 2006; accepted 18 June 2007.

Abstract 

Our experience has implicated cup inclination as an important factor in wear, whereas others have suggested that the hip center of rotation (COR) must be closely reestablished to reduce wear. We conducted a retrospective study to determine the relative importance of these 2 factors. One hundred thirty-nine total hip arthroplasties were studied after a mean follow-up of 9.2 years (range, 6-3 years). Forty-nine of 139 operated hips had a contralateral normal hip, which allowed the most accurate measurement of the influence of change in the COR. Wear was related to the inclination of the cup but not to a change in the COR. Secondarily, wear was less with a ceramic-polyethylene polyarticular surface than with metal-polyethylene. The importance of this data is related to cup implantation techniques. The hip COR can be moved superiorly and/or medially to permit cup inclination below 45° with correct cup coverage.

Key words: cup position, THA, acetabulum, wear, center of rotation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Benefits or funds in partial or total support of the research material described in this article were received from Zimmer, Inc., Warsaw, Indiana.

PII: S0883-5403(07)00361-0

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2007.06.008

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 23, Issue 1 , Pages 51-56, January 2008