The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 17, Issue 4, Supplement , Pages 138-141, June 2002

The long-term success of modular proximal fixation stems in revision total hip arthroplasty☆☆

Departments of Surgery, Pathology, and Engineering, The University of Toronto, and Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Orthopaedic and Arthritic Institute Site, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Abstract 

A prospective study was carried out on the use of a proximally modular, proximal ingrowth noncemented stem in hip revision surgery. There were 109 short stems and 211 long stems. The mean follow-up was 7 years (range, 2–12 years). No revisions were required in the short-stem group for aseptic loosening; 3 (1.4%) revisions were required in the long-stem group. Lucency was absent in 91.7% of short-stem cases, was low grade in 7.2%, and was high grade in 1.1%. In the long-stem group, lucency was absent in 72.9% of cases, was low grade in 24.5%, and was high grade in 2.6%. No measurable subsidence occurred in the short-stem group, and 5 mm of subsidence occurred early in 2 of the long-stem group. This subsidence stabilized subsequently. Osteolysis distal to the sleeve was not observed. A proximal ingrowth, proximally modular stem can be used in revision hip surgery. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Keywords:  hip revision, modular stems, long stems, femoral deformity

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Funds were received in partial or total support of the research material described in this article from DePuy, a Johnson & Johnson Company, Warsaw, Indiana.

☆☆ Reprint requests: Hugh U. Cameron, MB, ChB, FRCS(C), 43 Wellesley Street East, Suite 318, Toronto, Ontario M4Y 1H1 Canada.

PII: S0883-5403(02)70048-X

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 17, Issue 4, Supplement , Pages 138-141, June 2002