The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 21, Issue 6, Supplement , Pages 83-86 , September 2006

The Use of a Trabecular Metal Acetabular Component and Trabecular Metal Augment for Severe Acetabular Defects

Received 16 September 2005 ,Accepted 1 May 2006.

References 

  1. Weinstein . Dartmouth atlas of musculoskeletal healthcare. Chicago (Ill): AHA Press; 2001;
  2. Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty. 1994;9:33
  3. Bradford MS, Paprosky WG. Acetabular defect classification: a detailed radiographic approach. Semin Arthroplasty. 1995;6:76
  4. Emerson RH, Head WC. Dealing with the deficient acetabulum in revision hip arthroplasty: the importance of implant migration and use of the jumbo cup. Semin Arthroplasty. 1993;4:2
  5. Johnston RC, Fitzgerald RH, Harris WH, et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement. A standard system of terminology for reporting results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:161
  6. Morsi E, Garbuz D, Gross AE. Revision total hip arthroplasty with shelf bulk allografts. A long-term follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:86
  7. Woodgate IG, Saleh KJ, Jaroszynski G, et al. Minor column structural acetabular allografts in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2000;75
  8. Sporer SM, O'Rourke M, Chong P, et al. The use of structural distal femoral allografts for acetabular reconstruction. Average ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:760
  9. Goodman S, Saastamoinen H, Shasha N, et al. Complications of ilioischial reconstruction rings in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:436
  10. Udomkiat P, Dorr LD, Won YY, et al. Technical factors for success with metal ring acetabular reconstruction. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:961
  11. Chandler H, Lopez C, Murphy S, et al. Acetabular reconstruction using structural grafts in total hip replacement: a 12 1/2 year follow-up. Semin Arthroplasty. 1995;6:118
  12. Garbuz D, Morsi E, Gross AE. Revision of the acetabular component of a total hip arthroplasty with a massive structural allograft. Study with a minimum five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:693
  13. Unger AS, Lewis RJ, Gruen T. Evaluation of a porous tantalum uncemented acetabular cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical and radiological results of 60 hips. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:1002
  14. Nehme A, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD. Modular porous metal augments for treatment of severe acetabular bone loss during revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;201
  15. Bobyn JD, Stackpool GJ, Hacking SA, et al. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:907
  16. Zhang YAP, Fitzpatrick DC, Heiner AD, et al. Interfacial frictional behavior: cancellous bone, cortical bone, and a novel porous tantalum biomaterial. J Musculoskelet Res. 1999;3:245

 No benefits or funds were received in support of the study.

PII: S0883-5403(06)00381-0

doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.05.008

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 21, Issue 6, Supplement , Pages 83-86 , September 2006