The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 22, Issue 4 , Pages 504-508, June 2007

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Cementless Femoral Stems With and Without Hydroxyapatite/Tricalcium-Phosphate Coating:

An 8- to 12-Year Follow-Up Study

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

Received 24 October 2005; accepted 8 June 2006. published online 15 March 2007.

Abstract 

To evaluate the effect of hydroxyapatite coating on cementless femoral stem, a prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted. A total of 84 hips from 69 patients were assigned to a hydroxyapatite/tricalcium-phosphate–coated group or a noncoated group. Thirty-two patients (37 hips) who received hydroxyapatite/tricalcium-phosphate–coated stems and 31 patients (38 hips) who received noncoated stems were followed for an average of 127 months. Forty-nine patients (78%) were men, and the average age was 45.5 years. Preoperative diagnosis was osteonecrosis in 62 hips (83%). The mean Harris hip score at the time of final follow-up was 91 points in the coated group and 90 points in the noncoated group. Six acetabular components (3 in each group) were revised. One femoral stem in the noncoated group was loose. There was no statistical difference in the survival distributions of the implants between the 2 groups.

Key words: total hip arthroplasty, cementless, hydroxyapatite

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No benefits or funds were received in support of the study.

PII: S0883-5403(06)00467-0

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2006.06.005

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 22, Issue 4 , Pages 504-508, June 2007