The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 22, Issue 4 , Pages 481-489, June 2007

The Effects of Technique Changes on Aseptic Loosening of the Femoral Component in Hip Resurfacing. Results of 600 Conserve Plus With a 3 to 9 Year Follow-up

Joint Replacement Institute at Orthopaedic Hospital, Los Angeles, California

Received 24 May 2005; accepted 10 August 2006. published online 29 March 2007.

Abstract 

The purpose of the present study was to determine the effectiveness of modifications in the surgical technique on loosening of the femoral component in the first 600 consecutive Conserve Plus metal-on-metal hybrid resurfacings (Wright Medical Technologies, Arlington, Tenn). These modifications were gradually introduced over time, but all the changes were implemented after the first 300 hips. The average age of the patients was 48.9 years, and 74% were male. The average follow-up was 70.5 months for the first 300 hips and 42.4 months for the second 300, and there was a significant improvement (P = .016) of the second 300 hips over the first 300 in a time-dependant analysis using as an end point the time to appearance of a radiolucency, suggesting potential femoral component loosening. None of the components with cemented stems showed femoral radiolucencies or were revised for aseptic loosening. Adding fixation holes in the dome and chamfered areas and cleansing and drying using a suction tip in the dome hole were significantly related to the improvement of the results. Positioning the femoral component in a more valgus position did not show any effect as an independent variable.

Key words: hip, resurfacing, metal-on-metal, surgical technique

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Funding for this study was provided by the Los Angeles Orthopaedic Hospital Foundation, Los Angeles, California, the William G. McGowan Charitable Fund, Chicago, Illinois, and Wright Medical Technologies Inc, Arlington, Texas.

PII: S0883-5403(06)00570-5

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2006.08.001

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 22, Issue 4 , Pages 481-489, June 2007