The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 23, Issue 1 , Pages 151-155 , January 2008

Technical and Histologic Analysis of a Retrieved Carbon Fiber–Reinforced Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone Composite Alumina-Bearing Liner 28 Months After Implantation

  • Nicola Pace, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Nicola Pace, MD, Unità Operativa Ortopedia e Traumatologia, ASUR Regione Marche, Zona Territoriale n°5, Jesi, Viale della Vittoria, 79, 60035 Jesi, Italy.
  • ,
  • Mario Marinelli, MD
  • ,
  • Stefania Spurio, MD

Received 20 July 2005 ,Accepted 12 July 2006.

References 

  1. Pollock D, Sychterz C, Engh CA. A clinically practical method of manually assessing polyethylene liner thickness. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:1803
  2. Harris WH. The problem is osteolysis. Clin Orthop. 1995;311:46
  3. Wroblewski BM. Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in patients under the age of 40 years. In:  Sevastick Y,  Goldie I editor. The young patient with degenerative hip disease. Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell; 1985;p. 197
  4. Bradford L, Baker DA, Graham J, et al. Wear and surface cracking in early retrieved highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liners. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1271
  5. Witvoet J. Classification of total hip arthroplasties (THA). In:  Duparc J editors. Surgical techniques in orthopaedics and traumatology. Paris: Editions Scientifiques et Medicales Elsevier SAS; 2001;p. 51
  6. Howling GI, Sakoda H, Antonarulrajah A, et al. Biological response to wear debris generated in carbon based composites as potential bearing surfaces for artificial hip joints. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2003;67:758
  7. Katzer A, Marquardt H, Westendorf J, et al. Polyetheretherketone-cytotoxicity and mutagenicity in vitro. Biomaterials. 2002;23:1749
  8. Rivard CH, Rhalmi S, Coillard C. In vivo biocompatibility testing of peek polymer for a spinal implant system: a study in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;62:488
  9. Moore R, Beredjiklian P, Rhoad R, et al. A comparison of the inflammatory potential of particulates derived from two composite materials. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;34:137
  10. Dowd JE, Sychterz CJ, Young AM, et al. Characterization of long-term femoral-head-penetration rates. Association with and prediction of osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:1102
  11. Sychterz Christi J, Engh CA, Shah N, et al. Radiographic evaluation of penetration by the femoral head into the polyethylene liner over time. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1040
  12. McKellop HA, Campbell P, Park SH, et al. The origin of submicron polyethylene wear debris in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1995;311:3
  13. Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Northfield MR, et al. Quantitative assessment of walking activity after total hip or knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:54
  14. Willert HG, Buchhorn GH, Fayyazi A, et al. Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:28

 No benefits or funds were received in support of this study.

PII: S0883-5403(06)00627-9

doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.07.012

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 23, Issue 1 , Pages 151-155 , January 2008