Comparison of the 2-Incision and Mini-Incision Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty Technique: A Retrospective Match-Pair Controlled Study
Received 14 February 2006; accepted 26 September 2006.
Abstract
We compared the outcomes of the mini-posterior and 2-incision total hip arthroplasty approaches by analyzing 43 matched pairs of patients. The following outcomes were evaluated: (1) Harris Hip Score, (2) Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, (3) the Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale, and (4) the Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index. Function was regained earlier by patients having the 2-incision total hip arthroplasty as determined by length of hospitalization (P = .002) and multiple return to function parameters, although this may be the result of hip precautions placed on the posterior group. Posterior mini-incision patients had less operating time (P < .0001) and blood loss (P = .001). Complications did not differ between surgical techniques. No patients were revised. The 2-incision operation was better for function and length of stay, and the posterior mini-incision was easier to perform, although these groups used different selection criteria.
St. Vincent Hospital and Medical Center, Orthopaedic and Fracture Clinic, Portland, Oregon
Reprint requests: Paul R. Duwelius, MD, St. Vincent Hospital and Medical Center, Orthopaedic and Fracture Clinic, 11782 SW Barnes Rd. #300, Portland, OR.
Level of evidence: level II-1 (retrospective matched-pair study).
Benefits or funds were received in partial or total support of the research material described in this article from Zimmer Clinical Research Support and Royalties.
ABSTRACT