The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 23, Issue 2 , Pages 197-202 , February 2008

Component Position in 2-Incision Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty Compared to Standard Total Hip Arthroplasty

  • Susan Lai Williams, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, George Washington University, Washington, DC
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Paul Manner, MD, FRCSC, Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, 1959 Pacific Street NE, Box 356500, Seattle, WA 98105-6500.
    • ,
  • Casey Bachison, BS

      Affiliations

    • George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC
    • ,
  • James D. Michelson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC
    • ,
  • Paul A. Manner, MD, FRCSC

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Received 9 August 2006 ,Accepted 10 December 2006.

References 

  1. Berger RA, Duwelius PJ. The two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: technique and results. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:163
  2. Berry DJ, Berger RA, Callaghan JJ, et al. Symposium: minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty—development, early results, and a critical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85A:2235
  3. Tanzer M. Two-incision total hip arthroplasty: techniques and pitfalls. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:71
  4. Klein GR, Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, et al. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: internet claims made by members of the Hip Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:68
  5. Pagnano MW, Leone J, Lewallen DG, et al. Two-incision THA had modest outcomes and some substantial complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:86
  6. Bal BS, Haltom D, Aleto T, et al. Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with a two incision minimally invasive technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2432
  7. de Beer J, Petruccelli D, Zalzal P, et al. Single-incision, minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: length doesn't matter. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:945
  8. Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF, et al. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:1353
  9. Lawlor M, Humphreys P, Morrow E, et al. Comparison of early postoperative functional levels following total hip replacement using minimally invasive versus standard incisions. A prospective randomized blinded trial. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:465
  10. Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P, et al. A minimal incision technique does not improve early postoperative outcomes. A prospective randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:699
  11. Hart R, Stipcak V, Janecek M, et al. Component position following total hip arthroplasty through a miniinvasive posterolateral approach. Acta Orthop Belg. 2005;71:60
  12. Mardones R, Pagnano MW, Nemanich JP, et al. The Frank Stinchfield Award: muscle damage after total hip arthroplasty done with the two-incision and mini-posterior techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:63
  13. Suzuki K, Kawachi S, Sakai H, et al. Mini-incision total hip arthroplasty: a quantitative assessment of laboratory data and clinical outcomes. J Orthop Sci. 2004;9:571
  14. Dorr LD, Absatz M, Gruen TA, et al. Anatomic porous replacement hip arthroplasty: first 100 consecutive cases. Semin Arthroplasty. 1990;1:77
  15. Widmer KH. A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:387
  16. Fabeck L, Farrokh D, Tolley M, et al. A method to measure acetabular cup anteversion after total hip replacement. Acta Orthop Belg. 1999;65:485
  17. Pradhan R. Planar anteversion of the acetabular cup as determined from plain anteroposterior radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1999;81-B:431
  18. Archibeck MJ, White RE. Learning curve for the two-incision total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:232

 No benefits and funds were received in support of this study.

PII: S0883-5403(06)00891-6

doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.12.045

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 23, Issue 2 , Pages 197-202 , February 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution