The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 23, Issue 1 , Pages 86-89 , January 2008

Posterior Longitudinal Split Osteotomy for Femoral Component Extraction in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

  • Adrian John Bauze, MBBS, FRACS

      Affiliations

    • Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom
    • Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Adrian John Bauze, MBBS, FRACS, University of Adelaide Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Haydown Road, Elizabeth Vale, 5112, South Australia, Australia.
    • ,
  • John Charity, MD

      Affiliations

    • Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom
    • ,
  • Eleftherios Tsiridis, FRC (Orth)

      Affiliations

    • Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom
    • ,
  • A. John Timperley, FRCS

      Affiliations

    • Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom
    • ,
  • Graham A. Gie, FRCS E (Orth)

      Affiliations

    • Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom

Received 8 December 2005 ,Accepted 22 January 2007.

References 

  1. Williams HD, Browne G, Gie GA, et al. The Exeter universal cemented femoral component at 8 to 12 years. A study of the first 325 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:324
  2. Fowler JL, Gie GA, Lee AJC, et al. Experience with the Exeter total hip replacement since 1970. Orthop Clin North Am. 1988;9:477
  3. Gie GA, Linder L, Ling RSM, et al. Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:14
  4. Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB, Espehaug B, et al. The Norwegian arthroplasty register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:337
  5. Paprosky WG, Weeden SH, Bowling JW. Component removal in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2001;393:181
  6. Younger TI, Bradford MS, Paprosky WG. Removal of a well-fixed cementless femoral component with an extended proximal femoral osteotomy. Contemp Orthop. 1995;30:375
  7. Berry JD. Removal of cementless stems. AAOS ICL. 2003;52:331
  8. Burnstein G, Yoon P, Saleh K. Component removal in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2004;420:48
  9. Glassman AH, Engh CA, Bobyn JD. A technique of extensile exposure for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1987;2:11
  10. Hozack WJ. Component and cement removal. In:  Steinberg ME,  Garino JP editor. Revision total hip arthroplasty. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1999;p. 193
  11. MacDonald SJ, Cole C, Guerin J, et al. Extended trochanteric osteotomy via the direct lateral approach in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2003;417:210
  12. Taylor J, Rorabeck C. Hip revision arthroplasty: approach to the femoral side. Clin Orthop. 1999;369:208
  13. Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH. Porous coated hip replacements: the factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg. 1993;75B:14
  14. Barrack RL, Mulroy DM, Harris WH. Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty: a 12 year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg. 1992;74-B:385
  15. Harris WH, McCarthy JC, O'Neil DA. Femoral component loosening using contemporary techniques of femoral cement fixation. J Bone Joint Surg. 1982;64A:1063
  16. Charnley J. Numerical grading of clinical results. In:  Charnley J editors. Low friction arthroplasty of the hip: theory and practice. Springer-Verlag; 1979;p. 20

 No benefits or funds were received in support of the study.

PII: S0883-5403(07)00058-7

doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.01.014

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 23, Issue 1 , Pages 86-89 , January 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution