The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 23, Issue 1 , Pages 41-50, January 2008

In Vivo Determination of Total Knee Arthroplasty Kinematics:

A Multicenter Analysis of an Asymmetrical Posterior Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty

  • Richard D. Komistek, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee
    • Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Knoxville, Tennessee
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Richard D. Komistek, PhD, University of Tennessee, 313 Perkins Hall, Knoxville, TN 37996.
  • ,
  • Mohamed R. Mahfouz, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee
    • Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Knoxville, Tennessee
  • ,
  • Kim C. Bertin, MD

      Affiliations

    • Utah Bone and Joint Center, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • ,
  • Aaron Rosenberg, MD

      Affiliations

    • Rush Presbyterian, Chicago, Illinois
  • ,
  • William Kennedy, MD

      Affiliations

    • Kennedy-White Orthopaedic Center, Sarasota, Florida

Received 11 October 2005; accepted 22 January 2007. published online 24 September 2007.

Abstract 

The objective of this study was to determine if consistent posterior femoral rollback of an asymmetrical posterior cruciate retaining (PCR) total knee arthroplasty was mostly influenced by the implant design, surgical technique, or presence of a well-functioning posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). Three-dimensional femorotibial kinematics was determined for 80 subjects implanted by 3 surgeons, and each subject was evaluated under fluoroscopic surveillance during a deep knee bend. All subjects in this present study having an intact PCL had a well-functioning PCR knee and experienced normal kinematic patterns, although less in magnitude than the normal knee. In addition, a surprising finding was that, on average, subjects without a PCL still achieved posterior femoral rollback from full extension to maximum knee flexion. The findings in this study revealed that implant design did contribute to the normal kinematics demonstrated by subjects having this asymmetrical PCR total knee arthroplasty.

Key words: knee, arthroplasty, kinematics, in vivo, fluoroscopy, implant design

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Benefits or funds were received in partial or total support of the research material described in this article. These benefits and support were received from Zimmer, Inc.

PII: S0883-5403(07)00060-5

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2007.01.016

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 23, Issue 1 , Pages 41-50, January 2008