The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 23, Issue 1 , Pages 136-140, January 2008

Electromyographic Evaluation of the Midvastus Approach

  • David F. Dalury, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, the Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
    • Orthopaedic Associates, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: David F. Dalury, MD, c/o Elaine P. Henze, BJ, ELS, Medical Editor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, 4940 Eastern Ave., #A672, Baltimore, MD 21224-2780.
  • ,
  • Robert G. Snow, BS, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Impulse Monitoring Inc., Columbia, Maryland
  • ,
  • Mary Jo Adams, RN, BSN

      Affiliations

    • Orthopaedic Associates, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland

Received 23 May 2006; accepted 18 January 2007.

Abstract 

Compared with the standard median parapatellar approach, the muscle-splitting midvastus approach to the knee has led to claims of an easier and earlier recovery after total knee arthroplasty, but some investigators have questioned whether the midvastus approach damages the vastus medialis obliquus. We used electromyographic and nerve conduction studies to evaluate whether we could document any such damage. Twenty patients undergoing bilateral total knee arthroplasty were randomized prospectively for the treatment of 1 knee with each of the 2 approaches. Radiographs, electromyographies, nerve conduction studies, range-of-motion tests, and Knee Society function and pain tests were conducted preoperatively and at 6 weeks postoperatively. If the electromyography or nerve conduction tests were abnormal at 6 weeks, the tests were repeated at 12 weeks. At the final follow-up, these studies showed no evidence of muscle denervation. The midvastus approach appears to be a safe alternative for knee arthrotomy for total knee arthroplasty without concerns for damage to the vastus medialis obliquus.

Key words: electromyography, midvastus approach, total knee arthroplasty, parapatellar approach, outcome

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No benefits or funds were received in support of the study.

PII: S0883-5403(07)00064-2

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2007.01.020

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 23, Issue 1 , Pages 136-140, January 2008