The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 23, Issue 7 , Pages 960-963, October 2008

Periacetabular Osteotomy and Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Older Than 40 Years

Vancouver, BC, Canada

Received 6 April 2007; accepted 22 August 2007. published online 14 March 2008.

Abstract 

The objective of this study was to investigate quality of life (QOL) in patients with dysplasia who were older than 40 years and who underwent Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). Quality of life was compared among 28 patients who underwent PAO and 33 patients of the same age who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA). Outcome tools included the Western Ontario McMasters Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index and the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey. Seventy-three percent of PAO patients achieved a “very good” (75-100) outcome or a “good” (65-75) QOL score in pain dimension and 64% in function dimension at 4 years after operation. WOMAC pain (89 vs 71, P < .005) and function (90 vs 74, P < .005) scores were significantly better among THA patients (THA vs PAO). Although THA resulted in better QOL, osteotomy still provided excellent QOL outcome in a high percentage of patients older than 40 years. However, given the results of this study, in patients older than 40 years, periacetabular osteotomy should only be done in highly selected cases.

Key words: periacetabular osteotomy, quality of life outcome, total hip arthroplasty

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No benefits or funds were received in support of the study.

PII: S0883-5403(07)00511-6

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2007.08.015

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 23, Issue 7 , Pages 960-963, October 2008