The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 23, Issue 7 , Pages 999-1004, October 2008

A Recession of Posterior Cruciate Ligament in Posterior Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthrosplasty

  • Young-Hoo Kim, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Young-Hoo Kim, MD, The Joint Replacement Center of Korea at Ewha Womans University DongDaeMun Hospital, 70, ChongRo 6-Ga, ChongRo-Gu, Seoul, Korea 110-783.
  • ,
  • Jun-Shik Kim, MD
  • ,
  • Sung-Hwan Yoon, MD

Joint Replacement Center of Korea, Ewha Womans University Graduate, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Received 28 February 2007; accepted 6 September 2007. published online 25 February 2008.

Abstract 

The range of motion, the stability of the knee, and the prevalence of radiolucent lines in 68 posterior cruciate–retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) with a retained, but balanced, posterior cruciate ligament were compared with those in 68 knees with a posterior cruciate–substituting (PS) TKAs in the 60 patients who were managed with simultaneous bilateral TKAs. The average range of motion in both groups (126° vs 129°) at the latest follow-up was not significantly different (P = .359). No significant difference in the sagittal laxity of the knee was seen between 2 groups. The prevalence of radiolucent lines was 7% in the CR TKA with a recession posterior cruciate ligament and 12% in the PS TKA group (P = .108). We feel that posterior stabilization is unnecessary in the PS flex knees.

Key words: total knee arthroplasty, posterior cruciate–retaining but balanced, posterior cruciate–substituting, sagittal laxity, KT 1000 arthrometer

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No benefits or funds were received in support of the study.

PII: S0883-5403(07)00548-7

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2007.09.010

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 23, Issue 7 , Pages 999-1004, October 2008