The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 23, Issue 8 , Pages 1099-1104, December 2008

Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing:

Radiographic Evaluation Techniques

  • Rama Ramakrishnan, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Research, Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, New Jersey
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Rama Ramakrishnan, MSc, Stryker Orthopaedics, 325 Corporate Drive, Mahwah, NJ 07430.
  • ,
  • William L. Jaffe, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University/Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York
  • ,
  • William R. Kennedy, MD

      Affiliations

    • Kennedy-White Ortho Center, Sarasota, Florida

Received 8 May 2007; accepted 17 September 2007. published online 25 February 2008.

Abstract 

Hip resurfacing devices require a new radiographic evaluation technique owing to femoral components with short or no stems. Fourteen US surgeons implanted 1148 metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (HR) devices in a US-FDA-IDE clinical trial, which began in 2001. In this multi-center, prospective study, 337 patients (mean age, 50.1 years) were enrolled as a study group of unilateral HR arthroplasties. Radiographs of 292 HR arthroplasties at a minimum 2-year follow-up (maximum 3 years) were reviewed. There were 10 patients with radiographic evidence of femoral component instability beyond 2 years, as evidenced by subsidence ≥ 5mm. Of these, 7 did not have clinical symptoms associated with femoral component instability. In the study group, 24 revisions were reported, of which 8 were due to femoral neck fractures, 4 were due to acetabular component loosening, 11 were due to femoral component loosening, and 1 due to dislocation.

Key words: hip resurfacing, metal-on-metal, radiographic analysis, femoral component subsidence, neck impingement

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Benefits or funds were received in partial or total support of the research material described in this article from Stryker Orthopaedics (Mahwah, NJ).

PII: S0883-5403(07)00587-6

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2007.09.021

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 23, Issue 8 , Pages 1099-1104, December 2008