Advertisement
Logo
Search for

Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages 1099-1104 (December 2008)


View previous. 4 of 33 View next.

Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing: Radiographic Evaluation Techniques

Rama Ramakrishnan, MS*Corresponding Author Information, William L. Jaffe, MD, William R. Kennedy, MD

Received 8 May 2007; accepted 17 September 2007. published online 25 February 2008.

Abstract 

Hip resurfacing devices require a new radiographic evaluation technique owing to femoral components with short or no stems. Fourteen US surgeons implanted 1148 metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (HR) devices in a US-FDA-IDE clinical trial, which began in 2001. In this multi-center, prospective study, 337 patients (mean age, 50.1 years) were enrolled as a study group of unilateral HR arthroplasties. Radiographs of 292 HR arthroplasties at a minimum 2-year follow-up (maximum 3 years) were reviewed. There were 10 patients with radiographic evidence of femoral component instability beyond 2 years, as evidenced by subsidence ≥ 5mm. Of these, 7 did not have clinical symptoms associated with femoral component instability. In the study group, 24 revisions were reported, of which 8 were due to femoral neck fractures, 4 were due to acetabular component loosening, 11 were due to femoral component loosening, and 1 due to dislocation.

* Department of Clinical Research, Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, New Jersey

 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University/Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York

 Kennedy-White Ortho Center, Sarasota, Florida

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Rama Ramakrishnan, MSc, Stryker Orthopaedics, 325 Corporate Drive, Mahwah, NJ 07430.

 Benefits or funds were received in partial or total support of the research material described in this article from Stryker Orthopaedics (Mahwah, NJ).

PII: S0883-5403(07)00587-6

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2007.09.021


View previous. 4 of 33 View next.

Advertisement