The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 23, Issue 8 , Pages 1132-1139 , December 2008

Results of a Hydroxyapatite-Coated Modular Femoral Stem in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. A Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up

Received 11 September 2006 ,Accepted 13 October 2007.

References 

  1. Engh CA, Claus AM, Hopper RH, et al. Long-term results using the anatomic medullary locking hip prosthesis. Clin Orthop. 2001;393:137
  2. Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Cruz-Pardos A, Madero R, et al. Total hip arthroplasty with use of the cementless Zweymuller Alloclassic system. A ten to thirteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A:296
  3. Geesink FG, De Groot K, Klein CP. Chemical implant fixation using hydroxy-apatite coatings. The development of a human total hip prosthesis for chemical fixation to bone using hydroxyapatite coatings on titanium substrates. Clin Orthop. 1987;225:147
  4. Soballe K, Hansen ES, Brockstedt-Rasmussen H, et al. Hydroxyapatite coating converts fibrous tissue to bone around loaded implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75-B:270
  5. Moroni A, Faldini C, Pegreffi F, et al. The effect of hydroxyapatite on bone ingrowth into porous-coated titanium implants. Hip Int. 2002;12:153
  6. Kim YH, Kim JS, Oh SH, et al. Comparison of porous-coated titanium femoral stems with and without hydroxyapatite coating. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A:1682
  7. Capello WN, D'Antonio JA, Feinberg JR, et al. Ten-year results with hydroxyapatite-coated total hip femoral components in patients less than fifty years old. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A:885
  8. Oosterbos CJ, Rahmy AI, Tonino AJ, et al. High survival rate of hydroxyapatite-coated hip prostheses: 100 consecutive hips followed for 10 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:127
  9. Singh S, Thrika SP, Edge AJ. Hydroxyapatite ceramic-coated femoral stems in young patients. A prospective ten-year study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86-B:1118
  10. Christie MJ, DeBoer DK, Trick LW, et al. Primary total hip arthroplasty with use of the modular S-ROM prosthesis. Four to seven-year clinical and radiographic results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81-A:1707
  11. Sporer SM, Obar RJ, Bernini PM. Primary total hip arthroplasty using a modular proximally coated prosthesis in patients older than 70: two to eight year results. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:197
  12. Bobyn JD, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ, et al. Concerns with modularity in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1994;298:27
  13. Gacon P, Philippe MP, Ray A, et al. Metaphyseal and diaphyseal modular femoral stems implanted without cement. Rev Chir Orthop. 2001;87:331
  14. Devane PA, Horne JG, Martin K, et al. Three-dimensional polyethylene wear of a press-fit titanium prosthesis. Factors influencing generation of polyethylene debris. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:256
  15. Dorr LD, Faugere M-C, Mackel AM, et al. Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone. 1993;14:231
  16. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51-A:737
  17. Callaghan JD, Dysart SH, Savory CG. The uncemented porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis: two-years of a prospective consecutive series. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70-A:337
  18. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components. Clin Orthop. 1979;171:17
  19. Goetz DD, Smith JJ, Harris WH. The prevalence of femoral osteolysis associated with components inserted with or without cement in total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76-A:1121
  20. Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH. Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987;69-B:45
  21. Engh CA, Glassman AH, Suthers KE. The case for porous-coated hip implants. The femoral side. Clin Orthop. 1990;261:63
  22. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, et al. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement: incidence and method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55-A:1629
  23. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457
  24. Cruz-Pardos A, Garcia-Cimbrelo E. The Harris-Galante total hip arthroplasty: a minimum 8-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:586
  25. Garcia-Rey E, Coello-Nogues A, Caicoya-Abati E. Two different cementless femoral components in primary total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int. 2002;12:289
  26. Grant P, Nordsletten L. Total hip arthroplasty with the Lord prosthesis. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:2636
  27. Cameron HU. The two- to six-year results with a proximally modular noncemented total hip replacement used in hip revisions. Clin Orthop. 1994;298:47
  28. Cameron HU. The long-term success of modular proximal fixation stems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(4 Suppl 1):138
  29. Kwong LM, Miller AJ, Lubinus P. A modular distal fixation option for proximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: a 2- to 6-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18(3 Suppl 1):94
  30. Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. Femoral fixation in the face of considerable bone loss: the use of modular stems. Clin Orthop. 2004;429:227
  31. Cameron HU, Lee OB, Chou H. Total hip arthroplasty in patients with deficient bone stock and small femoral canals. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:35
  32. Christie M, Brinson MF. Proximal/distal mismatch: type A and C femurs. Orthopedics. 2005;28:s1033
  33. Capello WN, D'Antonio JA, Manley MT, et al. Hydroxyapatite in total hip arthroplasty. Clinical results and critical issues. Clin Orthop. 1998;355:200
  34. Geesink RG, Hoefnagels HN. Six-year results of hydroxyapatite-coated total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77-B:534
  35. Tanzer M, Gollish J, Leighton R, et al. The effect of adjuvant calcium phosphate coating on a porous-coated femoral stem. Clin Orthop. 2004;424:153
  36. Shetty AA, Slack R, Tindall A, et al. Results of a hydroxyapatite-coated (Furlong) total hip replacement. A 13- to 15-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87-B:1050
  37. Goosen JH, Swieringa AJ, Keet JG, et al. Excellent results from proximally HA-coated femoral stems with a minimum of 6 years follow-up: a prospective evaluation of 100 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 2005;76:190
  38. Hamadouche M, Witvoet J, Porcher R, et al. Hydroxyapatite-coated versus grit blasted femoral stems. A prospective, randomised study using EBRA-FCA. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83-B:979
  39. Söballe K, Toksvig-Larsen S, Gelineck J, et al. Migration of hydroxyapatite coated femoral prostheses. A Roentgen stereophotogrammetric study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75-B:681
  40. Campbell P, McKellop H, Park SH, et al. Evidence of abrasive wear by particles from a hydroxyapatite coated hip prosthesis. Trans Orthop Res Soc. 1993;18:224
  41. Söballe K, Overgaard S. Editorial. The current status of hydroxyapatite coating. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78-B:689
  42. Bloebaum RD, Dupont JA. Osteolysis from a press-fit hydroxyapatite-coated implant. A case study. J Arthroplasty. 1993;8:195
  43. Aebli N, Krebs J, Schwenke D, et al. Degradation of hydroxyapatite coating on a well-functioning femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85-B:499
  44. Herrera A, Canales V, Anderson J, et al. Seven to 10 years followup of an anatomic hip prosthesis: an international study. Clin Orthop. 2004;423:129
  45. Verbest TMJS, VanHeeswijk WHJC, Anderson PG, et al. Bone mineral density 10 years after a Zweymüller uncemented stem prosthesis. Hip Int. 2003;13:205
  46. Mulliken BD, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, et al. A tapered titanium femoral stem inserted without cement in a total hip arthroplasty. Radiographic evaluation and stability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78-A:1214
  47. Sakalkale DP, Eng K, Hozack WJ, et al. Minimum 10-year results of a tapered cementless hip replacement. Clin Orthop. 1999;362:138
  48. Karachalios T, Tsatsaronis C, Efraimis G, et al. The long-term clinical relevance of calcar atrophy caused by stress shielding in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:469

 No benefits or funds were received in support of the study.

PII: S0883-5403(07)00607-9

doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.012

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 23, Issue 8 , Pages 1132-1139 , December 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution