The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 23, Issue 8 , Pages 1105-1109, December 2008

Femoral Neck Narrowing After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing

  • Simon Spencer, MBChB, MRCS (Glasg)

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Simon Spencer, MBChB, MRCS, Specialist Registrar in Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Southern General Hospital, 1345 Govan Road, G51 4TF Glasgow, UK.
  • ,
  • Robert Carter, MBChB, FRCS (Tr & Orth)
  • ,
  • Helen Murray, RGN
  • ,
  • R.M. Dominic Meek, MD, FRCS (Tr & Orth)

Received 27 January 2007; accepted 14 October 2007. published online 14 April 2008.

Abstract 

We reviewed 40 Corin Cormet 2000 (Corin, Cirencester, UK) metal-on-metal resurfacing hips, in 36 patients, for the presence of femoral neck narrowing. A neck-to-prosthesis ratio was calculated by dividing the diameter of the femoral neck with that of the implant. This ratio was measured on plain anteroposterior pelvis radiographs taken immediately and 2 years postoperation. Subsequent radiographs were measured up to a maximum 7 years (mean, 5.3 years) postoperation. Femoral neck narrowing was observed in 90% of hips at 2 years, with the average neck narrowing ranging from a ratio of 0.865 to 0.811. Importantly, no further narrowing occurred beyond this point up to 7 years postoperation. We described a simple reproducible method of measuring neck narrowing on plain radiographs and discuss possible causal factors for neck narrowing after hip resurfacing.

Key words: hip resurfacing, femoral neck narrowing, stress shielding, metal on metal, Corin Cormet 2000

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No benefits or funds were received in support of this study.

PII: S0883-5403(07)00609-2

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.014

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 23, Issue 8 , Pages 1105-1109, December 2008