The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 23, Issue 7 , Pages 1068-1070 , October 2008

The Combined Anteversion Technique for Acetabular Component Anteversion

  • Christopher Amuwa, MD
    • ,
  • Lawrence D. Dorr, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Lawrence D. Dorr, MD, The Arthritis Institute at Good Samaritan Hospital, 637 S. Lucas Avenue, 1st Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90017.

Received 13 March 2008 ,Accepted 13 April 2008.

References 

  1. D'Lima DD, Urquhart AG, Buehler KO, et al. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:315
  2. Pierchon F, Pasquier G, Cotten A, et al. Causes of dislocation of total hip arthroplasty. CT study of component alignment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76:45
  3. Wines AP, McNicol D. Computed tomography measurement of the accuracy of component version in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:696
  4. Murray DW. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:228
  5. Komeno M, Hasegawa M, Sudo A, et al. Computed tomographic evaluation of component position on dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2006;29:1104
  6. McCollum DE, Gray WJ. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;159
  7. Widmer KH, Zurfluh B. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res. 2004;22:815
  8. Dorr LD, Malik A, Wan Z, et al. Precision and bias of imageless computer navigation and surgeon estimates for acetabular component position. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;465:92

 Benefits or funds were received in partial or total support of the research material described in this article from Zimmer, Inc.

PII: S0883-5403(08)00465-8

doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.025

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 23, Issue 7 , Pages 1068-1070 , October 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution