The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 24, Issue 7 , Pages 1006-1014, October 2009

Superelastic Cage Implantation:

A New Technique for Treating Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head with Mid-Term Follow-ups

Department of Orthopaedics, General Hospital of Chinese People's, Liberation Army, Beijing, PR China

Received 20 February 2008; accepted 23 July 2008. published online 10 October 2008.

Abstract 

We developed a device for the treatment of Ficat and Arlet stage II and III osteonecrosis of the femoral head. This device, which we named the “super-elastic cage,” was designed to provide mechanical support for the necrotic weight-bearing area of the femoral head to prevent its collapse. The cage was used in combination with surgical removal of necrotic bone, insertion of vascularized pedical bone graft, or impacted autologous cancellous bone graft. A total of 93 hips in 62 patients at Ficat stage II to III were included in a 8-year study. Implantations were performed by 2 different approaches: Smith-Peterson approach and minimal invasive approach by the lateral side of great trochanter. The follow-up period was between 72 and 107 months. Of the femoral heads in this study, 82.7% survived. The superelastic cage implantation technique may offer an alternative treatment to the early and middle stages of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Keywords: osteonecrosis, femoral head, superelastic cage

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No benefits or funds were received in support of the study.

PII: S0883-5403(08)00649-9

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2008.07.010

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 24, Issue 7 , Pages 1006-1014, October 2009