Advertisement
Logo
Search for

Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages 1170-1173 (December 2009)


View previous. 9 of 38 View next.

Comparison of Cemented vs Uncemented Acetabular Component Positioning Using an Imageless Navigation System

Mayur Chawda, FRCS (Tr & Orth), Peter Hucker, FRACS (Orth), Sarah L. Whitehouse, PhD, Ross W. Crawford, DPhil, Hugh English, FRACS (Orth)Corresponding Author Information, William J. Donnelly, FRACS (Orth)

Received 8 February 2008; accepted 19 September 2008. published online 05 December 2008.

Abstract 

Hip navigation was used as an assessment tool to compare ability to reproduce trial and definitive acetabular placement in total hip arthroplasty, using cemented and uncemented components. We demonstrated a significant difference in reproducibility between components. Of 20 uncemented cups, 4 (20%) deviated from the target inclination by 5° or more compared to none of 21 in the cemented group (P = .048). Of the 20 uncemented cups, 7 (35%) deviated from the target version by 5° or more compared to none of 21 in the cemented group (P = .003). This may explain higher rates of revision for dislocation with uncemented components. There was also a significant difference between the groups with regard to deviation from planned leg length (P < .001).

 Orthopaedic Research Unit, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

 Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

 Brisbane Orthopaedic Specialist Services, Holy Spirit Northside Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Hugh English, FRACS (Orth), Brisbane Orthopedic Specialist Services, Ground floor, Medical Centre, Holy Spirit Northside Hospital, 627 Rode Rd, Chermside, Brisbane, Queensland 4032, Australia.

 No benefits or funds were received in support of the study.

PII: S0883-5403(08)00779-1

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2008.09.018


View previous. 9 of 38 View next.

Advertisement