The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 2 , Pages 230-237, February 2010

Robot-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Orthopaedic Department, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York

Received 12 April 2008; accepted 14 September 2008. published online 05 December 2008.

Abstract 

The outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs) have demonstrated inconsistent long-term survival. We report the first clinical series of UKA using a semiactive robotic system for the implantation of an inlay unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Ten patients were selected for this study. Preoperative mechanical leg alignment values ranged from 0.3° varus to 9.8° varus. A haptic guidance system was used; a detailed description is given in the manuscript. The setup time for the robot was 41 minutes; intraoperative registration process, 7.5 minutes (6-13 minutes); skin incision, 8 cm; robot-assisted burring, 34.8 minutes (18-50 minutes); mean tourniquet time, 87.4 minutes (68-113 minutes); and overall operation time, 132 minutes (118-152 minutes). The planned and intraoperative tibiofemoral angle was within 1°. The postoperative long leg axis radiographs were within 1.6°. Haptic guidance in combination with a navigation module allows for precise planning and execution of both inlay components in UKA.

Keywords: robot assisted, uniknee arthroplasty, haptic guidance system, medial osteoarthritis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No benefits or funds were received in support of this study.

PII: S0883-5403(08)00785-7

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2008.09.024

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 2 , Pages 230-237, February 2010