« Previous
Next »
The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 2
, Pages 230-237
, February 2010
Robot-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
References
- Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;875:999
- Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;367:50
- 2002 US markets for reconstructive devices 2002. Toronto (Ontario, Canada): Millenium Research Group; 2003;
- . Mini-incision total knee arthroplasty can increase risk of component malalignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:77
- . Implant position in knee surgery: a comparison of minimally invasive, open unicompartmental, and total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003;187(Suppl 1):2
- Incidence and reasons for reoperation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;216(Suppl 2):98
- . Limb alignment in computer-assisted minimally-invasive unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;881:44
- The effect of alignment of the knee on the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;843:351
- Factors associated with the loss of thickness of polyethylene tibial bearings after knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;896:1306
- . Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;423:161
- . Posterior slope of the tibial implant and the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A3:506
- Survival of medial unicondylar arthroplasties placed by one surgeon 1984-1998. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:143
- . The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register: Annual Report 2006. Available at: http://www.knee.nko.se/english/online/uploadedFiles/107_SKAR2006_Eng/v2.pdf2005;
- . Failure mechanisms of unicompartmental knee replacement: the impact of changes in operative technique and component design. Semin Arthroplasty. 1991;21:23
- . Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the oxford prosthesis in patients with medial compartment arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;901:118
- . Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non–image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003;111:40
- Early failure of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;226(Suppl 2):81
- . The rationale for navigated minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;463:58
- Technique and first clinical results of robot-assisted total knee replacement. Knee. 2002;93:173
- Comparison of robotic-assisted and manual implantation of a primary total hip replacement. A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A8:1470
- . Clinical outcome following robotic assisted versus conventional total hip arthroplasty: a controlled and prospective study of seventy-one patients. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2005;1434:391
- Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement: a prospective, randomised controlled study of the acrobot system. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;882:188
- Navigation reduces the learning curve in resurfacing total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;463:90
- Robotic control in knee joint replacement surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. 2007;2211:71
- Robotic clinical trials of uni-condylar arthroplasty. Int J Med Robot. 2005;14:20
- . Influence of rotatory malposition of femoral implant in failure of unicompartimental medial knee prosthesis. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2006;925:473
- Minimally invasive oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: functional results at 1 year and the effect of surgical inexperience. Knee. 2004;115:363
No benefits or funds were received in support of this study.
PII: S0883-5403(08)00785-7
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.09.024
© 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 2
, Pages 230-237
, February 2010
