The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 1 , Pages 27-30, January 2010

Latex-Free Gloves:

Safer for Whom?

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, England

Received 3 June 2008; accepted 20 October 2008. published online 05 December 2008.

Abstract 

Increasing latex hypersensitivity among patients and health care workers has prompted the development of latex-free surgical gloves. Latex-free gloves must perform equally as the existing latex standard. We analyzed perforation rates in a clinical trial comparing latex and a latex-free alternative during primary hip and knee arthroplasty. The overall latex glove perforation rate was 8.4% compared with 21.6% for the latex-free alternative (χ2 P < .001). The operation perforation rate for latex gloves was 34.4% compared with 80% for latex-free gloves (χ2 P < .001). We suggest that the latex-free glove tested cannot provide a reliable barrier between the surgeon and the patient. As such, we question the safety of these gloves and the standards sets by the regulators.

Keywords: latex glove, latex free, arthroplasty, perforation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No benefits or funds were received in support of the study.

PII: S0883-5403(08)00812-7

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2008.10.014

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 1 , Pages 27-30, January 2010