The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 1 , Pages 41-45, January 2010

Do Commonly Reported Outcome Measures Reflect Patient Satisfaction After Revision Hip Arthroplasty?

  • Stefan R. Jibodh, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Stefan R. Jibodh, MD, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, GRJ1126, Boston, MA 02114.
  • ,
  • Abdurrahman O. Kandil, BS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Henrik Malchau, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Daniel M. Estok II, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Received 9 July 2008; accepted 23 October 2008. published online 05 December 2008.

Abstract 

The purpose of this study was to determine which commonly reported outcome measures best correlated with patient satisfaction after revision hip arthroplasty and to identify factors unrelated to hip status that may also play a role. From our institutional database, we identified 78 patients (80 hips) who underwent revision total hip arthroplasty and collected follow-up data. Patients with moderate or severe pain and those with limited walking ability reported significantly lower satisfaction scores. Harris hip score and patient-rated general health status were independently associated with patient satisfaction. Patient-rated anxiety and depression correlated inversely with satisfaction. Commonly reported outcome measures do reflect patient satisfaction after revision hip arthroplasty. However, satisfaction also appears to be influenced by psychologic factors.

Keywords: revision hip arthroplasty, patient satisfaction, Harris hip score, anxiety, depression

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No benefits or funds were received in support of the study.

PII: S0883-5403(08)00815-2

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2008.10.016

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 1 , Pages 41-45, January 2010