The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 1 , Pages 41-45 , January 2010

Do Commonly Reported Outcome Measures Reflect Patient Satisfaction After Revision Hip Arthroplasty?

  • Stefan R. Jibodh, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Stefan R. Jibodh, MD, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, GRJ1126, Boston, MA 02114.
    • ,
  • Abdurrahman O. Kandil, BS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
    • ,
  • Henrik Malchau, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
    • ,
  • Daniel M. Estok II, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Received 9 July 2008 ,Accepted 23 October 2008.

References 

  1. Kurtz S. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780
  2. Lubbeke A. Primary and revision hip arthroplasty: 5-year outcomes and influence of age and comorbidity. J Rheumatol. 2007;34:394
  3. Espehaug B. Patient satisfaction and function after primary and revision total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;351:135
  4. Saleh KJ. Functional outcome after revision hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;
  5. Robinson AH. Is revision as good as primary hip replacement? A comparison of quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:42
  6. Suk M. AO handbook: musculoskeletal outcomes measures and instruments. In: Switzerland: AO Publishing; 2005;p. 1
  7. Tashjian RZ. Factors influencing patient satisfaction after rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:752
  8. Londers J. Hip arthroscopy: outcome and patient satisfaction after 5 to 10 years. Acta Orthop Belg. 2007;73:478
  9. Thomas S. Patient satisfaction after open release of common extensor origin in treating resistant tennis elbow. Acta Orthop Belg. 2007;73:443
  10. Noble PC. The John Insall Award: Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:35
  11. Robertsson O. Patient satisfaction compared with general health and disease-specific questionnaires in knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:476
  12. Barrack RL. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the patient's perspective. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:173
  13. Brokelman RB. Patient versus surgeon satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:495
  14. Lieberman JR. Differences between patients' and physicians' evaluations of outcome after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:835
  15. Eisler T. Patient expectation and satisfaction in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:457
  16. Charnley J. The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;319:4
  17. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:737
  18. Soderman P. Is the Harris hip score system useful to study the outcome of total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;384:189
  19. Johnson JA. Comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-12 in an adult US sample. Qual Life Res. 1998;7:155
  20. Johnson JA. Valuation of EuroQOL (EQ-5D) health states in an adult US sample. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;13:
  21. Fryback DG. US norms for six generic health-related quality-of-life indexes from the National Health Measurement study. Med Care. 2007;45:1162
  22. Clark CR. Leg-length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:38
  23. Hofmann AA. Leg-length inequality and nerve palsy in total hip arthroplasty: a lawyer awaits. Orthopedics. 2000;23:943
  24. Upadhyay A. Medical malpractice in hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(6 Suppl 2):2
  25. Brander V. Pain and depression influence outcome 5 years after knee replacement surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;464:21
  26. Brander VA. Predicting total knee replacement pain: a prospective, observational study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;
  27. Schade V. The impact of clinical, morphological, psychosocial and work-related factors on the outcome of lumbar discectomy. Pain. 1999;80:239
  28. Sinikallio S. Lumbar spinal stenosis patients are satisfied with short-term results of surgery—younger age, symptom severity, disability and depression decrease satisfaction. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:537
  29. Sinikallio S. Depression is associated with poorer outcome of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:905
  30. Rosenberger PH. Psychosocial factors and surgical outcomes: an evidence-based literature review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:397

 No benefits or funds were received in support of the study.

PII: S0883-5403(08)00815-2

doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.10.016

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 1 , Pages 41-45 , January 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution