The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 3 , Pages 369-374, April 2010

Clinical and Radiographic Results for the Richards Modular Hip System Prosthesis in Total Hip Arthroplasty:

Average 10-Year Follow-Up

Department of Orthopaedics, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan

Received 24 February 2008; accepted 21 December 2008. published online 05 February 2009.

Abstract 

The clinical results of total hip arthroplasty using the Richards Modular Hip System prosthesis were evaluated in 41 patients (44 joints). The mean Harris hip score improved from 42 points before surgery to 82 after 1 year, 85 at 5 years, and 79 at the final examination. The average polyethylene wear rate was 0.09 ± 0.07 mm/y. Forty joints (90.9%) achieved press fit in either of the proximal or the distal stem portion, and only 4 joints (9.1%) failed to achieve press fit in both the proximal and distal stem portions. Although the 10-year survival of the stem was 94.5% and no revisions of the stem were performed, osteolysis was found at high frequency at a distal stem. The high incidence of osteolysis has been the limiting factor in the long-term success of Richards Modular Hip System. Achievement of good canal fill in both the proximal and distal stem portions did not contribute to the good long-term result of the stem.

Keywords: total hip arthroplasty, Richards Modular Hip System, cementless, long-term results, modular

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No benefits or funds were received in support of the study.

PII: S0883-5403(08)01004-8

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2008.12.008

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 3 , Pages 369-374, April 2010