The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 2 , Pages 186-190 , February 2010

Successful Performance of the Bi-Metric Uncemented Femoral Stem at a Minimum Follow-Up of 13 Years in Young Patients

  • Howard Davies, MRCS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Ipswich Hospital, Ipswich, Suffolk, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Howard Davies, MRCS, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Ipswich Hospital, Heath Road, Ipswich, IP4 5PD Suffolk, UK.
    • ,
  • Ben Ollivere, MRCS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Ipswich Hospital, Ipswich, Suffolk, UK
    • ,
  • Joseph Motha, FRCS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, West Suffolk Hospital, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, UK
    • ,
  • Matthew Porteous, FRCS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, West Suffolk Hospital, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, UK
    • ,
  • Adrian August, FRCS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, West Suffolk Hospital, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, UK

Received 8 December 2007 ,Accepted 26 November 2008.

References 

  1. Eftekhar NS, Nercessian O. Incidence and mechanism of failure of cemented acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1988;19:557
  2. Duffy GP, Papa B, Rowland CM, et al. Primary uncemented Harris-Galante acetabular components in patients 50 years old or younger: results at 10 to 12 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;427:157
  3. Clohisy JC, Harris WH. The Harris-Galante uncemented femoral component in primary total hip replacement at 10 years. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:915
  4. Kim YH, Kim JS, Cho SH. Primary total hip arthroplasty with the AML total hip prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;360:147
  5. McLaughlin JR, Lee KR. Total hip arthroplasty in young patients 8 to 13 year results using an uncemented stem. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;373:153
  6. Delaunay C, Kapandji AL. 10-year survival of Zweymuller total prostheses in primary uncemented arthroplasty of the hip. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1998;84:421
  7. Aldinger PR, Breusch SJ, Lukoschek M, et al. A ten to 15 year follow-up of the cementless Sportorno stem. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 2003;85:209
  8. McNally SA, Shepperd JAN, Mann CV, et al. The results at nine to twelve years of the use of a hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 2000;82:378
  9. Eskelinen A, Remes V, Helenius I, et al. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in young patients. A mid to long term follow-up study from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand. 2006;77:57
  10. Eskelinen A, Remes V, Helenius I, et al. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:28
  11. Lyback CC, Lyback CO, Kyro A, et al. Survival of Bi-Metric femoral stems in 77 total hip arthroplasties for juvenile chronic arthritis. Int Orthop. 2004;28:357
  12. Jacobsen S, Jensen FK, Poulsen K, et al. Good performance of a titanium femoral component in cementless hip arthroplasty in younger patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74:375
  13. Meding JB, Keating EM, Ritter MA, et al. Minimum ten-year follow-up of a straight stemmed, plasma-sprayed, titanium-alloy, uncemented femoral component in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 2004;86:92
  14. Boden H, Salemyr M, Skoldenberg O, et al. Total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented hydroxyapatite-coated tapered titanium stem: results at a minimum of 10 years' follow-up in 104 hips. J Orthop Sci. 2006;11:175
  15. Malchau H, Karrholm J, Wang YX, et al. Accuracy of migration analysis in hip arthroplasty. Digitized and conventional radiography compared to radiostereometry in 51 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1995;66:418
  16. Gruen TA. Modes of failure of cemented stem-type femoral components. Clin Orthop. 1979;141:17
  17. DeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop. 1976;121:20
  18. Hodgkinson JP, Shelley P, Wroblewski BM. The correlation between the roentgenographic appearance and operative findings at the bone-cement junction of the socket in the Charnley low friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1988;228:105
  19. Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers MEA. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;257:107
  20. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, et al. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1973;55:1629
  21. Murray DW, Carr AJ, Bulstrode C. Survival analysis of joint replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:697
  22. Whiteside LA, Easley JC. The effect of collar and distal stem fixation on micromotion of the femoral stem in uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;239:145
  23. Meding JB, Ritter MA, Keating EM, et al. Comparison of collared and collarless components in primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:273
  24. Kelley SS, Fitzgerald RH, Rand JA, et al. A prospective randomised study of a collar versus a collarless femoral prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;294:114
  25. Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Ghazal ME, et al. Pain in the thigh following total hip replacement with a porous coated anatomic prosthesis for osteoarthritis. A five year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1994;76:1464
  26. Lavernia C, D'Apuzzo M, Hernandez V, et al. Thigh pain in primary total hip arthroplasty: the effects of elastic moduli. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(7 supp12):10
  27. Strom H, Kolstad K, Mallmin H, et al. Comparison of the uncemented Cone and the Bi-Metric hip prosthesis in young patients with osteoarthritis: an RSA, clinical and radiographic study. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:71
  28. Grubel A, Chiari C, Gruber M, et al. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with a tapered, rectangular titanium stem and a threaded cup. A minimum ten-year follow up. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 2002;84-A:425
  29. Archibeck M, Berger R, Jacobs J, et al. Second-generation cementless total hip arthroplasty. Eight to eleven year results. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 2001;83-A:1666
  30. Puolakka TJ, Laine HJ, Moilanen TP, et al. Alarming wear of the first-generation polyethylene liner of the cementless porous coated Biomet Universal cup: 107 hips followed for a mean 6 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72:1
  31. Llewellyn-Isaac D, Forder J, Skyrme A, et al. The Biomet Bi-Metric total hip arthroplasty and Universal Acetabular cup. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:697
  32. Puolakka TJ, Pajamaki KJ, Pulkkinen PO, et al. Poor survival of cementless Biomet total hip: a report on 1047 hips from the Finnish arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop Scand. 1999;70:425
  33. Orishimo KF, Claus AM, Sycterz CJ, et al. Relationship between polyethylene wear and osteoysis in hips with a second-generation porous coated cementless cup after 7 years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003;85-A:1095.
  34. Kawamura H, Dunbar MJ, Murray P, et al. The porous coated anatomic total hip replacement. A ten to fourteen year follow-up study of a cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 2001;83-A:1333

 No benefits or funds were received in support of the study.

PII: S0883-5403(09)00013-8

doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.11.105

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 2 , Pages 186-190 , February 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution