The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 2 , Pages 173-178 , February 2010

Fifteen-Year to 19-Year Follow-Up of the Insall-Burstein-1 Total Knee Arthroplasty

  • Ayesha R. Abdeen, MD, FRCSC

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Ayesha R. Abdeen, MD, FRCSC, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Stoneman 10, Boston, MA 02215.
    • ,
  • Stacy B. Collen, BSc

      Affiliations

    • Department of Statistics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
    • ,
  • Kelly G. Vince, MD, FRCSC

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California

Received 7 January 2008 ,Accepted 10 January 2009.

References 

  1. Stern SH, Insall JN. Posterior stabilized prosthesis. Results after follow-up of nine to twelve years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:980
  2. Insall JN, Lachiewicz PF, Burstein AH. The posterior stabilized condylar prosthesis: a modification of the total condylar design. Two to four-year clinical experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:1317
  3. Bartel DL, Burstein AH, Santavicca EA, et al. Performance of the tibial component in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:1026
  4. Thadani PJ, Vince KG, Ortaaslan SG, et al. Ten- to 12-year followup of the Insall-Burstein I total knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;17
  5. Scott WN, Rubinstein M, Scuderi G. Results after knee replacement with a posterior cruciate-substituting prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:1163
  6. Patel DV, Aichroth PM, Wand JS. Posteriorly stabilised (Insall-Burstein) total condylar knee arthroplasty. A follow-up study of 157 knees. Int Orthop. 1991;15:211
  7. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, De Felice R, et al. The Insall-Burstein total knee replacement in osteoarthritis: a 10-year minimum follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:560
  8. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, et al. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;13
  9. Merchant AC, Mercer RL, Jacobsen RH, et al. Roentgenographic analysis of patellofemoral congruence. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56:1391
  10. O'Rourke MR, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, et al. Osteolysis associated with a cemented modular posterior-cruciate–substituting total knee design: five to eight-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A:1362
  11. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;9
  12. Rothman KJ. Estimation of confidence limits for the cumulative probability of survival in life table analysis. J Chronic Dis. 1978;31:557
  13. Armitage . Statistical methods in medical research. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific; 1973;
  14. Rodriguez JA, Bhende H, Ranawat CS. Total condylar knee replacement: a 20-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;10
  15. Insall JN, Scott WN. Surgery of the knee. New York,: Chuchill-Livingstone; 2001;

 No benefits or funds were received in support of the study.

 Level of evidence: therapeutic level IV.

PII: S0883-5403(09)00015-1

doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.01.009

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 2 , Pages 173-178 , February 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution