The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 3 , Pages 375-380 , April 2010

Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Spongy Metal Surface Hip Prosthesis With a Collarless, Proximally Porous-Coated Stem

  • Hiroyasu Ogawa, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Gifu University, School of Medicine Gifu, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Hiroyasu Ogawa, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gifu University, School of Medicine. 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu, Gifu, 501-1194 Japan.
    • ,
  • Yoshiki Ito, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Gifu University, School of Medicine Gifu, Japan
    • ,
  • Mansho Itokazu, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Hirano General Hospital Gifu, Japan
    • ,
  • Nobuyuki Mori, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Gifu University, School of Medicine Gifu, Japan
    • ,
  • Nobuo Terabayashi, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Gifu University, School of Medicine Gifu, Japan
    • ,
  • Katsuji Shimizu, MD, DMSc

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Gifu University, School of Medicine Gifu, Japan

Received 21 April 2008 ,Accepted 10 January 2009.

References 

  1. Sinha RK, Dungy DS, Yeon HB. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a proximally porous-coated femoral stem. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1254
  2. Kim YH, Kim JS, Oh SH, et al. Comparison of porous-coated titanium femoral stems with and without hydroxyapatite coating. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1682
  3. Laine HJ, Puolakka TJ, Moilanen T, et al. The effects of cementless femoral stem shape and proximal surface texture on ‘fit-and-fill’ characteristics and on bone remodeling. Int Orthop. 2000;24:184
  4. Chen CJ, Xenos JS, McAuley JP, et al. Second-generation porous-coated cementless total hip arthroplasties have high survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;451:121
  5. Bolognesi MP, Pietrobon R, Clifford PE, et al. Comparison of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve and a porous-coated sleeve with a modular revision hip stem. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2720
  6. Incavo SJ, Schneider R, Elting J. The effect of surface coating of femoral prostheses implanted without cement: a 2- to 4-year follow-up study. Am J Orthop. 1998;27:355
  7. Nourbash PS, Paprosky WG. Cementless femoral design concerns. Rationale for extensive porous coating. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;355:189
  8. Kim YH, Kim VE. Cementless porous-coated anatomic medullary locking total hip prostheses. J Arthroplasty. 1994;9:243
  9. Woolson ST, Maloney WJ. Cementless total hip arthroplasty using a porous-coated prosthesis for bone ingrowth fixation. 3 1/2-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 1992;7(Suppl):381
  10. Butler JB, Lansky D, Duwelius PJ. Prospective evaluation of total hip arthroplasty with a cementless, anatomically designed, porous-coated femoral implant: mean 11-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:709
  11. Yamaguchi K, Masuhara K, Ohzono K, et al. Evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. The influence of the extent of porous coating. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:1426
  12. Matsui M, Nakata K, Masuhara K, et al. The metal-cancellous cementless Lübeck total hip arthroplasty. Five-to-nine-year results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:404
  13. Plötz W, Gradinger R, Rechl H, et al. Cementless prosthesis of the hip joint with “spongy metal” surface. A prospective study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1992;111:102
  14. Sugano N, Saito S, Takaoka K, et al. Spongy metal Lübeck hip prostheses for osteoarthritis secondary to hip dysplasia. A 2-6-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 1994;9:253
  15. Hasegawa Y, Iwata H, Mizuno M, et al. The natural course of osteoarthritis of the hip due to subluxation or acetabular dysplasia. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1992;111:187
  16. Merle d' Aubigné R, Postel M. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1954;36:451
  17. Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH. Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987;69:45
  18. Tompkins GS, Jacobs JJ, Kull LR, et al. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component. Seven-to-ten-year results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:169
  19. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;141:17
  20. DeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;121:20
  21. Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, et al. Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone. 1993;14:231
  22. Callaghan JJ, Dysart SH, Savory CG. The uncemented porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis. Two-year results of a prospective consecutive series. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:337
  23. Hofmann AA, Feign ME, Klauser W, et al. Cementless primary total hip arthroplasty with a tapered, proximally porous-coated titanium prosthesis: a 4- to 8-year retrospective review. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:833
  24. Engh CA, Bobyn JD. The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;231:7

 No benefits or funds were received in support of the study.

PII: S0883-5403(09)00018-7

doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.01.012

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 3 , Pages 375-380 , April 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution