Advertisement
Logo
Search for

Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 203-207 (February 2010)


View previous. 9 of 43 View next.

Hylamer vs Conventional Polyethylene in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Long-Term Case-Control Study of Wear Rates and Osteolysis

James I. Huddleston, MD, Alex H.S. Harris, PhD, Cesar A. Atienza, MD, Steven T. Woolson, MDCorresponding Author Information

Received 9 November 2008; accepted 4 February 2009. published online 06 March 2009.

Abstract 

The long-term results of Hylamer implants have not been reported previously. Clinical and radiographic results of a consecutive series of 43 patients (45 hips) who had primary total hip arthroplasty using Hylamer liners were compared with those of 37 patients (43 hips) who had conventional liners after 10-year follow-up. The linear wear rates for Hylamer and conventional polyethylene acetabular liners were 0.21 and 0.20 mm/y, respectively. The number of pelvic osteolytic lesions and their size detected on plain radiographs were significantly greater for Hylamer liners. Seven Hylamer hips were revised or are pending revision for osteolysis (16%) compared with 1 control hip. Close radiographic surveillance of patients who have Hylamer liners and evidence of osteolysis found on plain radiographs is warranted.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Steven T. Woolson, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, MC5331, Stanford, CA 94305-5341.

 Alex H.S. Harris, PhD, received support from the Palo Alto Veteran's Administration Hospital, Palo Alto, CA.

 No benefits or funds were received in support of the study.

PII: S0883-5403(09)00053-9

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2009.02.006


View previous. 9 of 43 View next.

Advertisement