The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 3 , Pages 387-391, April 2010

Hip Flexion After Birmingham Hip Resurfacing:

Role of Cup Anteversion, Anterior Femoral Head-Neck Offset, and Head-Neck Ratio

Department of Orthopaedics, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom

Received 13 March 2008; accepted 25 January 2009. published online 16 March 2009.

Abstract 

We aimed to investigate the factors affecting range of flexion after hip resurfacing. A total of 82 cases, operated by a single surgeon, were assessed at a mean of 43 months. The Einzel-Bild-Roentgen-Analysis for the acetabular cup software was used to measure socket orientation. Range of flexion had a moderate positive correlation with cup anteversion (R = 0.26, P = .017), weak but significant negative correlation with neck diameter (R = −0.23, P = .042), and none with anterior femoral head-neck offset. Using multivariate analysis that adjusted for age, sex, cup anteversion and inclination, head-neck offset ratio, head-neck ratio, and neck diameter, the only significant correlate of flexion was cup anteversion (P = .017). Care should be taken during cup placement to allow adequate anteversion to be maintained in Birmingham hip resurfacing because this can affect flexion range of motion.

Keywords: flexion, hip resurfacing, EBRA, anterior femoral head-neck offset, cup version

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No benefits or funds were received in support of the study.

PII: S0883-5403(09)00058-8

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2009.01.026

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 3 , Pages 387-391, April 2010