The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 3 , Pages 363-368, April 2010

Modified Trochanteric Slide for Complex Hip Arthroplasty:

Clinical Outcomes and Complication Rates

Division of Arthroplasty, Orthopedic Department, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Received 6 November 2008; accepted 22 February 2009. published online 23 March 2009.

Abstract 

The sliding trochanteric osteotomy preserves vastus lateralis continuity with the osteotomized greater trochanter (GT) and the abductors. The modified trochanteric sliding osteotomy (MTSO) also preserves the posterior capsule and external rotators to reduce the risk of dislocations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our clinical and radiographic results of the MTSO exposure. Eighty-three MTSOs were reviewed. Follow-up range was 12 to 126 months. Seventy osteotomies (84.4%) healed with bony union, 9 (10.8%) had fibrous union, and 4 (4.8%) had nonunion. There was no correlation between the width of the osteotomy, intraoperative fragmentation of the GT, or the type of femoral component and the rate of union. Six (7.2%) patients developed a new abductor lurch. Patients with union of the GT had 2.8% of a lurch, and patients with either fibrous union or nonunion had a 30.7% of a lurch (P < .05). There were 4 (4.8%) postoperative dislocations. The benefits of MTSO have been well described, and this study provides evidence of an acceptably low complication rate.

Keywords: revision total hip arthroplasty, surgical approach, trochanteric slide osteotomy, acetabular component

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No benefits or funds were received in support of the study.

PII: S0883-5403(09)00067-9

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2009.02.017

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 3 , Pages 363-368, April 2010