The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 3 , Pages 355-362 , April 2010

Durable Fixation With a Modern Fully Hydroxylapatite-Coated Long Stem in Complex Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

  • Ormonde M. Mahoney, MD

      Affiliations

    • Athens Orthopedic Clinic, PA, Athens, Georgia
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Ormonde M. Mahoney, MD, Athens Orthopedic Clinic, PA, 1765 Old West Broad Street, Building 2, Suite 200, Athens, GA 30606.
    • ,
  • Tracy L. Kinsey, MSPH

      Affiliations

    • Athens Orthopedic Clinic, PA, Athens, Georgia
    • ,
  • Isao Asayama, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kawasaki Hospital Bone and Joint Research Center, Keijin-kai Kawasaki Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan

Received 3 March 2008 ,Accepted 23 March 2009.

References 

  1. Capello WN, D'Antonio JA, Feinberg JR, et al. Hydroxyapatite-coated total hip femoral components in patients less than fifty years old. Clinical and radiographic results after five to eight years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:7
  2. D'Antonio JA, Capello WN, Crothers OD, et al. Early clinical experience with hydroxyapatite-coated femoral implants. [see comment] J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:7
  3. D'Antonio JA, Capello WN, Manley MT. Remodeling of bone around hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:8
  4. D'Antonio JA, Capello WN, Manley MT, et al. Hydroxyapatite femoral stems for total hip arthroplasty: 10- to 13-year followup. Clin Orthop. 2001;393
  5. Geesink RG. Hydroxyapatite-coated total hip prostheses. Two-year clinical and roentgenographic results of 100 cases. Clin Orthop. 1990;39:261
  6. Geesink RG, Hoefnagels NH. Six-year results of hydroxyapatite-coated total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:4
  7. Huiskes R. The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems. Clin Orthop. 1990;27:261
  8. Huiskes R, Seinans H. Biomechanical aspects of hydroxylapatite coatings on femoral hip prostheses. In:  Geesink R,  Manley MT editor. Hydroxylapatite coatings in orthopaedic surgery. New York: Raven Press; 1993;p. 63
  9. Huiskes R, Weinans H, Dalstra M. Adaptive bone remodeling and biomechanical design considerations for noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 1989;12:9
  10. Krishnamurthy AB, MacDonald SJ, Paprosky WG. 5- to 13-year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revision surgery. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:8
  11. Lawrence JM, Engh CA, Macalino GE. Revision total hip arthroplasty. Long-term results without cement. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993;24:4
  12. Moreland JR, Bernstein ML. Femoral revision hip arthroplasty with uncemented, porous-coated stems. Clin Orthop. 1995;141:319
  13. Reikeras O, Gunderson RB. Excellent results with femoral revision surgery using an extensively hydroxyapatite-coated stem: 59 patients followed for 10-16 years. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:1
  14. Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J. Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1999;230:369
  15. Crawford CH, Malkani AL, Incavo SJ, et al. Femoral component revision using an extensively hydroxyapatite-coated stem. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:1
  16. Zalzal P, Gandhi R, Petruccelli D, et al. Fractures at the tip of long-stem prostheses used for revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:6
  17. Ullmark G, Obrant KJ. Histology of impacted bone-graft incorporation. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:2
  18. Engelbrecht E, Heinert K. Klassifidation und behindlungsrichtungen von knochen-substansverlusten bei revisionoperationen am huftgelenk. In:  Arcq M editors. Primär-und Revisions-Alloarthroplastik Hüft-und Kniegelenk. 10 Jahre Endo-Klinik Hamburg, Berlin: Springer; 1987;p. 189
  19. Valle CJD, Paprosky WG. Classification and an algorithmic approach to the reconstruction of femoral deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A(Suppl 4):
  20. Asayama I, Chamnongkich S, Simpson K, et al. Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:4
  21. Lind M, Krarup N, Mikkelsen S, et al. Exchange impaction allografting for femoral revision hip arthroplasty: results in 87 cases after 3.6 years' follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:2
  22. Mallory TH. Preparation of the proximal femur in cementless total hip revision. Clin Orthop. 1988;47:235
  23. Johnston RC, Fitzgerald RH, Harris WH, et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement. A standard system of terminology for reporting results. [see comment][erratum appears in J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991 Jul;73(6):952] J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:2
  24. Asayama I, Naito M, Fujisawa M, et al. Relationship between radiographic measurements of reconstructed hip joint position and the Trendelenburg sign. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:6
  25. Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. [see comment] [erratum appears in Clin Orthop 1992 Nov;(284):310-2] Clin Orthop. 1990;107:257

 Benefits or funds were received in partial or total support of the research material described in this article. These benefits or support was received from the following sources: Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ.

PII: S0883-5403(09)00103-X

doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.03.022

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 3 , Pages 355-362 , April 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution