The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 4 , Pages 624-634.e2 , June 2010

Factors Affecting Bony Impingement in Hip Arthroplasty

  • William B. Kurtz, MD

      Affiliations

    • Tennessee Orthopaedic Alliance, Nashville, Tennessee
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: William B Kurtz, MD, Tennessee Orthopaedic Alliance, 301 21st Ave South, Nashville, TN 37203.
    • ,
  • Timo M. Ecker, MD

      Affiliations

    • Center for Computer Assisted and Reconstructive Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
    • ,
  • William M. Reichmann, BS

      Affiliations

    • New England Baptist Statistical Department, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
    • ,
  • Stephen B. Murphy, MD

      Affiliations

    • Center for Computer Assisted and Reconstructive Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Received 24 June 2008 ,Accepted 28 March 2009.

References 

  1. Hirakawa K, Mitsugi N, Koshino T, et al. Effect of acetabular cup position and orientation in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;135
  2. Pagnano W, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG, et al. The effect of superior placement of the acetabular component on the rate of loosening after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1004
  3. McQueary FG, Johnston RC. Coxarthrosis after congenital dysplasia. Treatment by total hip arthroplasty without acetabular bone-grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:1140
  4. Linde F, Jensen J, Pilgaard S. Charnley arthroplasty in osteoarthritis secondary to congenital dislocation or subluxation of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;227:164
  5. Kelley SS. High hip center in revision arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1994;9:503
  6. Karachalios T, Hartofilakidis G, Zacharakis N, et al. A 12- to 18-year radiographic follow-up study of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. The role of the center of rotation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;140
  7. Kobayashi S, Takaoka K, Saito N, et al. Factors affecting aseptic failure of fixation after primary Charnley total hip arthroplasty. Multivariate survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1618
  8. Ranawat CS, Dorr LD, Inglis AE. Total hip arthroplasty in protrusio acetabuli of rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62:1059
  9. Gore DR, Murray MP, Gardner GM, et al. Roentgenographic measurements after Muller total hip replacement. Correlations among roentgenographic measurements and hip strength and mobility. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59:948
  10. Russotti GM, Harris WH. Proximal placement of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:587
  11. Callaghan JJ. Results of revision for mechanical failure after THA. JBJS. 1985;67A:1074
  12. Dearborn JT, Harris WH. High placement of an acetabular component inserted without cement in a revision total hip arthroplasty. Results after a mean of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:469
  13. Charnley J, Feagin JA. Low-friction arthroplasty in congenital subluxation of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1973;98
  14. Yoder SA, Brand RA, Pedersen DR, et al. Total hip acetabular component position affects component loosening rates. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;79
  15. Jasty M, Anderson MJ, Harris WH. Total hip replacement for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;40
  16. Dorr LD, Tawakkol S, Moorthy M, et al. Medial protrusio technique for placement of a porous-coated, hemispherical acetabular component without cement in a total hip arthroplasty in patients who have acetabular dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:83
  17. Sakalkale DP, Sharkey PF, Eng K, et al. Effect of femoral component offset on polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;125
  18. Denham RA. Hip mechanics. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1959;41-B:550
  19. Inman VT. Functional aspects of abductor muscles of the hip. JBJS. 1947;29:607
  20. Charnley J. Low Friction Arthroplasty. 1974;
  21. Johnston RC, Brand RA, Crowninshield RD. Reconstruction of the hip. A mathematical approach to determine optimum geometric relationships. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61:639
  22. Delp SL, Wixson RL, Komattu AV, et al. How superior placement of the joint center in hip arthroplasty affects the abductor muscles. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;137
  23. Doehring TC, Rubash HE, Shelley FJ, et al. Effect of superior and superolateral relocations of the hip center on hip joint forces. An experimental and analytical analysis. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:693
  24. Charnley J. Total hip replacement by low-friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1970;72:7
  25. Pauwels F. Die Bedeutung der Bauprinzipien des Stutz und Bewegungsapparantes fur die Beansprunchung der Rohrenknochen. Z Anat Entwicklungsgesch. 1948;114:129
  26. Asayama I, Chamnongkich S, Simpson KJ, et al. Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:414
  27. McGrory BJ, Morrey BF, Cahalan TD, et al. Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:865
  28. Wroblewski BM, Siney PD, Fleming PA. Wear of the cup in the Charnley LFA in the young patient. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:498
  29. Schmalzried TP, Shepherd EF, Dorey FJ, et al. The John Charnley Award. Wear is a function of use, not time. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;36
  30. Krushell RJ, Burke DW, Harris WH. Range of motion in contemporary total hip arthroplasty. The impact of modular head-neck components. J Arthroplasty. 1991;6:97
  31. Kummer FJ, Shah S, Iyer S, et al. The effect of acetabular cup orientations on limiting hip rotation. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:509
  32. Chandler DR, Glousman R, Hull D, et al. Prosthetic hip range of motion and impingement. The effects of head and neck geometry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;284
  33. Burroughs BR, Hallstrom B, Golladay GJ, et al. Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:11
  34. Amstutz HC, Lodwig RM, Schurman DJ, et al. Range of motion studies for total hip replacements. A comparative study with a new experimental apparatus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975;124
  35. Gondi G, Roberson JR, Ganey TM, et al. Impingement after total hip arthroplasty related to prosthetic component selection and range of motion. J South Orthop Assoc. 1997;6:266
  36. Bartz RL, Nobel PC, Kadakia NR, et al. The effect of femoral component head size on posterior dislocation of the artificial hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:1300
  37. D'Lima DD, Urquhart AG, Buehler KO, et al. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:315
  38. Yoshimine F, Ginbayashi KA. Mathematical formula to calculate the theoretical range of motion for total hip replacement. J Biomech. 2002;35:989
  39. Widmer KH, Zurfluh B. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res. 2004;22:815
  40. Widmer KH, Majewski M. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005;20:723
  41. Yoshimine F. The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements. J Biomech. 2005;
  42. D'Lima DD, Chen PC, Colwell CW. Optimizing acetabular component position to minimize impingement and reduce contact stress. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A(Suppl 2 Pt 2):87
  43. Seki M, Yuasa N, Ohkuni K. Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulation. J Orthop Res. 1998;16:513
  44. Robinson RP. Joint motion and surface contact area related to component position in THA. JBJS. 1997;79-B:140
  45. Kessler O, Patil S, Stefan W, et al. Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: a subject-specific approach. J Orthop Res. 2008;26:443
  46. Jaramaz B, DiGioia AM, Blackwell M, et al. Computer assisted measurement of cup placement in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;2:70
  47. Murphy SB, Kijewski PK, Millis MB, et al. Acetabular dysplasia in the adolescent and young adult. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;214
  48. Murphy SB, Simon SR, Kijewski PK, et al. Femoral anteversion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:1169
  49. Tannast M, Kubiak-Langer M, Langlotz F, et al. Noninvasive three-dimensional assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res. 2007;25:122
  50. Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF. Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:282
  51. Loughead JM, Chesney D, Holland JP, et al. Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:163
  52. Nadzadi ME. Kinematics, kinetics, and finite element analysis of commonplace maneuvers at risk for total hip dislocations. J Biomech. 2003;36:577
  53. Johnston RC, Smidt GL. Hip motion measurements for selected activities of daily living. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1970;72:205
  54. Ranawat C, Maynard MJ. Modern techniques of cemented total hip arthroplasty. Tech Orthop. 1991;6:17
  55. Lucas D, Scott RD. The Ranawat sign: a specific maneuver to assess component positioning in total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Tech. 1994;2:59

 No benefits or funds were received in support of the study.

PII: S0883-5403(09)00105-3

doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.03.024

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 4 , Pages 624-634.e2 , June 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution