The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 24, Issue 7 , Pages 999-1005 , October 2009

Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using an Anterior Approach and a Fracture Table: Short-term Results From a Community Hospital

  • Steven T. Woolson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Steven T. Woolson, MD, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Drive, MC 5331, Stanford, CA 94305.
    • ,
  • Michael A. Pouliot, BA

      Affiliations

    • Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
    • ,
  • James I. Huddleston, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California

Received 22 April 2008 ,Accepted 3 April 2009.

References 

  1. Berry DJ, Berger RA, Callaghan JJ, et al. Symposium: minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Development, early results and a critical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:2235
  2. Dorr LD, Maheshwari AV, Long WT, et al. Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1153
  3. de Beer J, Petruccelli D, Zalzal P, et al. Single-incision, minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: length doesn't matter. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:945
  4. Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P, et al. Minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:701
  5. Vicar AJ, Coleman CR. A comparison of the anterolateral, transtrochanteric and posterior surgical approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1984;188:152
  6. Woo RY, Morrey BF. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone and Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:1295
  7. Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T. Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on the orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop. 2005;441:115
  8. Siguier T, Siguier M, Brumpt B. Mini-incision anterior approach does not increase dislocation rate: a study of 1037 total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop. 2004;426:164
  9. Nogler M, Krismer M, Hozack WJ, et al. A double offset broach handle or preparation of the femoral cavity in minimally invasive anterior total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:1206
  10. American Society of Anesthesiologists. New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology. 1963;24:11
  11. Mow CS, Woolson ST, Ngarmukos SG, et al. Comparison of scars from total hip replacements done with a standard or a mini-incision. Clin Orthop. 2005;441:80
  12. Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF, et al. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1353
  13. Peters CL, McPherson E, Jackson JD, et al. Reduction in early dislocation rate with large-diameter femoral heads in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:140
  14. Colwell CW, Hozack WJ, Mesko JW, et al. Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty early dislocation rate. Clin Orthop. 2007;461:45
  15. Archibeck MJ, White RE. Learning curve for the two-incision total hip replacement. Clin Orthop. 2004;429:232

 No benefits or funds were received in support of the study.

PII: S0883-5403(09)00106-5

doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.001

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 24, Issue 7 , Pages 999-1005 , October 2009

Article Tools