The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 5 , Pages 728-734 , August 2010

Systematic Review of Medial Parapatellar and Subvastus Approaches in Total Knee Arthroplasty

  • Michael G. Bourke, BPhty

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physiotherapy, QEII Jubilee Hospital, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Michael G. Bourke, BPhty, Department of Physiotherapy, QEII Jubilee Hospital, Locked Bag 2, Archerfield, Brisbane, Queensland 4108, Australia.
    • Division of Physiotherapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  • ,
  • Peter J. Buttrum, BPhty

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physiotherapy, QEII Jubilee Hospital, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  • ,
  • Prudence L. FitzPatrick, MBBS, FRACS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, QEII Jubilee Hospital, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  • ,
  • Philip A. Dalton, BPhty (Hons), MMedSc, MBBS (Hons), FRACS CIME

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, QEII Jubilee Hospital, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  • ,
  • Gwendolen A. Jull, PhD, MPhty, FACP

      Affiliations

    • Division of Physiotherapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  • ,
  • Trevor G. Russell, PhD, BPhty

      Affiliations

    • Division of Physiotherapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Received 16 December 2008 ,Accepted 7 June 2009.

References 

  1. Australian Orthopaedic Association , National Joint Replacement Registry . Annual Report. Adelaide: Australian Orthopaedic Association; 2007;
  2. Cameron S. Subvastus versus medial parapatellar arthrotomy in total knee arthroplasty. J Appl Res. 2001;1(suppl 2):95
  3. Cila E. Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2002;122(suppl 2):65
  4. Faure B. Comparison of the subvastus and paramedian surgical approaches in bilateral knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1993;8(suppl 5):511
  5. Hofmann A. Subvastus (southern) approach for primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1991;269:70
  6. Matsueda M. Subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2000;371:161
  7. Roysam G. Subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, and observer-blinded trial. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(suppl 4):454
  8. von Langenbeck B. Zur resection des kniegelenks. Verh Dtsch Ges Churg. 1878;VII:23
  9. Holtby R. Osteonecrosis and resorption of the patella after total knee replacement: a case report. Clin Orthop. 1996;328:155
  10. Kayler D. Surgical interruption of patellar blood supply by total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1988;229:221
  11. Scuderi G. The relationship of lateral releases to patella viability in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1987;2(suppl 3):209
  12. Erkes F. Weitere erfahrungen mit physiologischer schnitt fuhrung zur eroffnung des kniegelenks. Bruns Beitr Klin Chir. 1929;147:221
  13. Cushner F. The subvastus approach to the knee. J Knee Surg. 2003;16(suppl 1):52
  14. Knezevich S. Comparison of subvastus quadriceps-sparing and standard quadriceps-splitting approaches in total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Orthop Trans. 1992;16:615
  15. Sporer S. The minimally invasive subvastus approach for primary total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2006;19(suppl 1):58
  16. In: Higgins JPT, Green S editor. version 5.0.1 [updated February 2008]. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Oxford, England: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2008;
  17. In: Clarke M editors. 4.1.4. Cochrane reviewers’ handbook. Oxford, England: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2001;
  18. Jadad A. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized and controlled trials: is blinding necessary. Control Clin Trials. 1996;17:1
  19. Khan R. Surgical approaches in total knee arthroplasty (protocol). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;CD005329
  20. National Health and Medical Research Council. Australian Government, NHMRC additional levels of evidence and grades for recommendations for developers of guidelines. PILOT PROGRAM 2005-2007.
  21. Weinhardt C. Early results of subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in primary total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;124(suppl 6):401

 No benefits or funds were received in support of the study.

PII: S0883-5403(09)00231-9

doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.06.008

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 5 , Pages 728-734 , August 2010