The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 26, Issue 1 , Pages 137-143.e1, January 2011

Measuring Patellofemoral Forces and Pressures in a Simulated Operating Room Environment

Received 5 January 2009; accepted 12 September 2009. published online 09 November 2009.

Abstract 

The purpose of this study was to use a validated capacitive pressure (Novel Electronics, Inc, St Paul, Minn) in the measurement and distribution of patellofemoral forces and pressures during simulated operative procedures. Six fresh frozen cadaver knees were evaluated through a range of motion and observations recorded in native knees (NKNP) with sequential resurfacing of tibiofemoral (RKNP) and patellofemoral (RKRP) articulations with standard and gender (GKRP) components. Significant lateral-medial maximum force differentials were observed for all conditions. Significant lateral-medial peak pressure differentials were observed in RKNP and RKRP. A significant decrease in lateral maximum force from RKRP to GKRP (P = .01) was observed. Significant increases in lateral peak were seen from NKNP to RKNP (P = .04) and RKNP to RKRP (P = .047), whereas a significant decrease was seen from RKRP to GKRP (P < .01). Achieving a quantitative intraoperative assessment of patellar tracking and soft tissue balancing may offer benefits in terms of intraoperative decision making. This is the first reported study to simulate quantitative, intraoperative assessments of patellofemoral pressure and force.

Keywords: total knee arthroplasty, patellofemoral joint, contact area, pressure, force-sensing device

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Benefits or funds were received in partial or total support of the research material described in this article. These benefits or support were received from the following sources: Zimmer, Inc.

 Supplementary material available at www.arthroplastyjournal.org.

PII: S0883-5403(09)00444-6

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2009.09.004

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 26, Issue 1 , Pages 137-143.e1, January 2011