The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 8 , Pages 1258-1266, December 2010

Morbid Obesity and Excessive Hospital Resource Consumption for Unilateral Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

  • Sunny H. Kim, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Sunny Kim, PhD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3800, Sacramento, CA 95817.

Received 14 May 2009; accepted 12 September 2009. published online 02 November 2009.

Abstract 

Two objectives of this study were (i) to estimate the number of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed on morbidly obese people in the United States, and (ii) to estimate the economic impact of morbid obesity on hospital resource use. In 2006, approximately 2.9% (6713 cases) of primary THA and 4.2% (20 964 cases) of primary TKA recipients were diagnosed as morbidly obese. Despite the controversy associated with increased infection risk and failure rate, a large number of morbidly obese people seem to consider that the benefits outweigh the risks. When sex, age, race, and primary payer were held constant, the hospital resource consumption for unilateral primary THA and TKA was 9% ($1432) and 7% ($1025) higher among morbidly obese patients than among nonobese patients, respectively.

Keywords: obesity, arthroplasty, THA, TKA, hospital costs, hospital charges

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No benefits or funds were received in support of the study.

PII: S0883-5403(09)00445-8

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2009.09.005

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 8 , Pages 1258-1266, December 2010