The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 26, Issue 2 , Pages 328-334, February 2011

Torque Measures of Common Therapies for the Treatment of Flexion Contractures

  • Timothy L. Uhl, PhD, ATC, PT, FNATA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
  • ,
  • Cale A. Jacobs, PhD, ATC

      Affiliations

    • Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
    • ERMI Inc, Atlanta, Georgia
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Cale A. Jacobs, PhD, 441 Armour Pl NE, Atlanta, GA 30324.

Received 7 July 2009; accepted 8 December 2009. published online 08 March 2010.

Abstract 

Efficacy of knee flexion contracture treatment protocols is dependent on the torque applied to the joint, but to date, no published reports have evaluated the torque applied by the available treatment options. The purpose of this study was to measure the torque applied by physical therapists (PTs), home exercises, and mechanical therapy devices. An instrumented test leg recorded peak torque applied by 14 PTs performing knee extension mobilization, 2 home exercises, and 3 types of mechanical therapy (dynamic splint, static progressive stretch, and patient-actuated serial stretch). Physical therapists applied 68.0 N m, patient-actuated serial stretch mechanical therapy applied 53.0 N m, and the other therapies ranged between 4.6 and 12.4 N m. The reported torque values can be used to help improve the efficacy of flexion contracture treatment protocols.

Keywords: extension loss, flexion contracture, manual therapy, mechanical therapy, home exercise

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No benefits or funds were received in support of the study

 The second author is an employee of ERMI Inc, Atlanta, Ga.

PII: S0883-5403(09)00576-2

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2009.12.007

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 26, Issue 2 , Pages 328-334, February 2011