The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 3 , Pages 410-415, April 2010

A Prospective Evaluation of 2 Different Pain Management Protocols for Total Hip Arthroplasty

Rothman Institute of Orthopaedics at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Received 17 July 2009; accepted 4 January 2010. published online 10 February 2010.

Abstract 

Pain management after total hip arthroplasty has improved dramatically in the past decade. However, most protocols use opioid medications for pain control. In the current study, 100 patients were prospectively selected to receive a traditional narcotic-based patient-controlled analgesia protocol or a nonnarcotic oral protocol for pain management after primary total hip arthroplasty. Therapy programs were similar for both groups. Postoperatively, patients were followed daily for opioid use, medication adverse effects, pain control, and overall satisfaction. The nonnarcotic oral group showed lower mean pain scores during the first 24 hours after surgery. The satisfaction rate was high in both groups. Both protocols provided adequate pain control after total hip arthroplasty; the nonnarcotic pain management protocol resulted in significantly decreased opioid consumption and fewer adverse effects.

Keywords: pain management, total hip arthroplasty, narcotic consumption, adverse effects, satisfaction

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supplementary material available at www.arthroplastyjournal.org.

 No benefits or funds were received in support of the study.

PII: S0883-5403(10)00010-0

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2010.01.003

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 3 , Pages 410-415, April 2010