The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 4 , Page 668 , June 2010

Received 6 November 2009 ,Accepted 25 January 2010.

References 

  1. Karpman RR, Smith HL. Comparison of the early results of minimally invasive vs standard approaches to total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:681
  2. Bewick V, Cheek L, Ball J. Statistics review 9: one-way analysis of variance. Crit Care. 2004;8:130
  3. Senghas RE. Statistics in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery: suggestions for authors. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:319
  4. Petrie A. Statistics in orthopaedic papers. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:1121
  5. Kocher MS, Zurakowski D. Clinical epidemiology and biostatistics: a primer for orthopaedic surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:607
  6. Bubbar VK, Kreder HJ. The intention-to-treat principle: a primer for the orthopaedic surgeon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:2097
  7. Herman A, Botser IB, Tenenbaum S, Chechick A. Intention-to-treat analysis and accounting for missing data in orthopaedic randomized clinical trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2137

PII: S0883-5403(10)00128-2

doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.01.095

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 4 , Page 668 , June 2010

Article Tools