The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 5 , Pages 671-679.e1 , August 2010

Prospective Randomized Study of Two Surgical Approaches for Total Hip Arthroplasty

Received 17 July 2009 ,Accepted 3 February 2010.

References 

  1. Berger RA. Mini-incision total hip replacement using an anterolateral approach: technique and results. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:143
  2. Berger RA, Duwelius PJ. The two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: technique and results. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:163
  3. Bertin KC, Rottinger H. Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;248
  4. Hartzband MA. Posterolateral minimal incision for total hip replacement: technique and early results. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:119
  5. Berger RA. The technique of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty using the two-incision approach. Instr Course Lect. 2004;53:149
  6. Howell JR, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Minimally invasive versus standard incision anterolateral hip replacement: a comparative study. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:153
  7. Kennon R, Keggi J, Zatorski LE, et al. Anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: beyond the minimally invasive technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A(Suppl 2):91
  8. Kennon RE, Keggi JM, Wetmore RS, et al. Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive anterior surgical approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A(Suppl 4):39
  9. Sculco TP. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(4 Suppl 1):78
  10. Siguier T, Siguier M, Brumpt B. Mini-incision anterior approach does not increase dislocation rate: a study of 1037 total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;164
  11. Wenz JF, Gurkan I, Jibodh SR. Mini-incision total hip arthroplasty: a comparative assessment of perioperative outcomes. Orthopedics. 2002;25:1031
  12. Chimento GF, Pavone V, Sharrock N, et al. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:139
  13. Dorr LD, Maheshwari AV, Long WT, et al. Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1153
  14. Bennett D, Ogonda L, Elliott D, et al. Comparison of gait kinematics in patients receiving minimally invasive and traditional hip replacement surgery: a prospective blinded study. Gait Posture. 2006;23:374
  15. de BJ, Petruccelli D, Zalzal P, et al. Single-incision, minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: length doesn't matter. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:945
  16. Mow CS, Woolson ST, Ngarmukos SG, et al. Comparison of scars from total hip replacements done with a standard or a mini-incision. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:80
  17. Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF, et al. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:1353
  18. Berger RA, Jacobs JJ, Meneghini RM, et al. Rapid rehabilitation and recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;239
  19. Pour AE, Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, et al. Minimally invasive hip arthroplasty: what role does patient preconditioning play?. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1920
  20. Hardinge K. The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1982;64:17
  21. Moskal JT, Mann JW. A modified direct lateral approach for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. A prospective analysis of 453 cases. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:255
  22. Cherny NI. Opioid analgesics: comparative features and prescribing guidelines. Drugs. 1996;51:713
  23. Levy MH. Pharmacologic treatment of cancer pain. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1124
  24. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:737
  25. Saleh KJ, Mulhall KJ, Bershadsky B, et al. Development and validation of a lower-extremity activity scale. Use for patients treated with revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1985
  26. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833
  27. Priestman TJ, Baum M. Evaluation of quality of life in patients receiving treatment for advanced breast cancer. Lancet. 1976;1:899
  28. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473
  29. Hall KM, Cohen ME, Wright J, et al. Characteristics of the Functional Independence Measure in traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1471
  30. Lovell TP. Single-incision direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty using a standard operating table. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23(7 Suppl):64

 Supplementary material available at www.arthroplastyjournal.org.

 Benefits or funds were received in partial or total support of the research material described in this article. These benefits or support were received from the following sources: J.P., Consultant for Stryker Orthopaedics (Mahwah, NJ), Intellectual Properties of SmarTech (Philadelphia, Pa).

PII: S0883-5403(10)00139-7

doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.02.002

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 25, Issue 5 , Pages 671-679.e1 , August 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution