The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 26, Issue 2 , Pages 192-197 , February 2011

Initial Experience With the Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Received 1 October 2009 ,Accepted 19 February 2010.

References 

  1. Cole BJ, Harner CD. Degenerative arthritis of the knee in active patients: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1999;7:389
  2. Dennis MG, Di Cesare PE. Surgical management of the middle age arthritic knee. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2003;61:172
  3. Pagnano MW, Clarke HD, Jacofsky DJ, et al. Surgical treatment of the middle-aged patient with arthritic knees. Instr Course Lect. 2005;54:251
  4. Price AJ, Webb J, Topf H, et al. Oxford Hip and Knee Group Rapid recovery after Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:970
  5. Scott RD. Unicondylar arthroplasty: redefining itself. Orthopedics. 2003;26:951
  6. Reilly KA, Beard DJ, Barker KL, et al. Efficacy of an accelerated recovery protocol for Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty—a randomised controlled trial. Knee. 2005;12:351
  7. Beard DJ, Murray DW, Rees JL, et al. Accelerated recovery for unicompartmental knee replacement—a feasibility study. Knee. 2002;9:221
  8. Newman JH, Ackroyd CE, Shah NA. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80-B:862
  9. McAuley JP, Engh GA, Ammeen DJ. Revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;279
  10. Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, et al. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:262
  11. O'Connor JJ, Goodfellow JW. Theory and practice of meniscal knee replacement: designing against wear. Proc Inst Mech Eng. 1996;210:217;Part H-Journal of Engineering in Medicine
  12. Emerson RH, Hansborough T, Reitman RD, et al. Comparison of a mobile with a fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee implant. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;62
  13. Psychoyios V, Crawford RW, O'Connor JJ, et al. Wear of congruent meniscal bearings in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a retrieval study of 16 specimens. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:976
  14. Svard UC, Price AJ. Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:191
  15. Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O'Connor JJ. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:983
  16. Lewold S, Robertsson O, Knutson K, et al. Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcome in 1135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study. Acta Orthop Scand. 1998;69:469
  17. Sibanda N, Copley LP, Lewsey JD, et al. Revision rates after primary hip and knee replacement in England between 2003 and 2006. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e179
  18. Vardi G, Strover AE. Early complications of unicompartmental knee replacement: the Droitwich experience. Knee. 2004;11:389
  19. Vorlat P, Verdonk R, Schauvlieghe H. The Oxford unicompartmental knee prosthesis: a 5-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8:154
  20. Harrysson OL, Robertsson O, Nayfeh JF. Higher cumulative revision rate of knee arthroplasties in younger patients with osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;162

 No benefits or funds were received in support of the study.

PII: S0883-5403(10)00147-6

doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.02.007

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 26, Issue 2 , Pages 192-197 , February 2011

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution