The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 26, Issue 6, Supplement , Pages 14-18, September 2011

Early Failure of Articular Surface Replacement XL Total Hip Arthroplasty

  • Garen D. Steele, MD

      Affiliations

    • OrthoCarolina, PA, Charlotte, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Thomas K. Fehring, MD

      Affiliations

    • OrthoCarolina, PA, Charlotte, North Carolina
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Thomas K. Fehring, MD, OrthoCarolina, PA, 2001 Vail Avenue, Suite 200-A, Charlotte, NC 28207.
  • ,
  • Susan M. Odum, MEd

      Affiliations

    • OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc, Charlotte, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Anne C. Dennos, BS

      Affiliations

    • OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc, Charlotte, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Matthew C. Nadaud, MD

      Affiliations

    • Knoxville Orthopedic Clinic, Knoxville, Tennessee

Received 6 January 2011; accepted 13 March 2011. published online 11 May 2011.

Abstract 

The ASR (articular surface replacement) XL (DePuy, Warsaw, Ind) metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty offers the advantage of stability and increased motion. However, an alarming number of early failures prompted the evaluation of patients treated with this system. A prospective study of patients who underwent arthroplasty with the ASR XL system was performed. Patients with 2-year follow-up or any revision were included. Failure rates, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, and radiographs were evaluated. Ninety-five patients (105 hips) were included. There were 16 revisions. Thirteen (12%) were aseptic acetabular failures. Eight were revised for aseptic loosening; 4, for metallosis; 1, for malposition; 2, for infection; and 1, for periprosthetic fracture. Mean time to revision was 1.6 years (0.18-3.4 years). The ASR XL with a revision rate of 12% is the second reported 1 piece metal-on-metal system with a significant failure rate at early follow-up. This particular class of implants has inherent design flaws that lead to early failure.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The Conflict of Interest statement associated with this article can be found at doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.03.027.

PII: S0883-5403(11)00126-4

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.03.027

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 26, Issue 6, Supplement , Pages 14-18, September 2011