The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 26, Issue 6, Supplement , Pages 84-87, September 2011

The Reliability and Variation of Acetabular Component Anteversion Measurements From Cross-Table Lateral Radiographs

Received 13 July 2010; accepted 22 March 2011. published online 16 May 2011.

Abstract 

Although cross-table lateral (CL) radiographs are frequently used to assess acetabular component anteversion, the reliability of this method has not been established. We compared serial CL radiographs with computed tomography (CT) scans for 98 total hip arthroplasty patients (119 hips) undergoing surveillance of primary or revision total hip arthroplasty. Acetabular anteversion averaged 26.1° (range, −2° to 48.3°) on CL imaging and 28.8° (range, −7° to 54°) on CT scan. There was a strong correlation between anteversion determined from CT scans and serial CL images. However, variation on serial CL studies exceeded 10° for 20% of patients. Although CL imaging provides acceptable assessment of general component position, it has limited use for precise analysis in research, outcome reporting, or determination of cause of implant failure.

Keywords: CT, cross-table lateral, anteversion

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 No benefits or funds were received in support of the study.

 This study was performed at Washington University School of Medicine and Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO.

 The Conflict of Interest statement associated with this article can be found at doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.03.039.

PII: S0883-5403(11)00151-3

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.03.039

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 26, Issue 6, Supplement , Pages 84-87, September 2011