Volume 26, Issue 6, Supplement , Pages 28-34, September 2011
Prospective Randomized Comparison of High-Flex and Standard Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty
Abstract
We sought to determine if the rotating platform (RP) high-flex design provides improved flexion compared with the standard RP total knee. A total of 142 patients were randomized to receive an RP flex (RP-F) or RP TKA. Supine flexion was measured with a goniometer and lateral x-ray. There was no difference in flexion measured at any interval between groups (1-year clinical flexion RP, 124.0°; RP-F, 124.2°; P = .949; 1-year x-ray flexion RP, 117.9°; RP-F, 117.6°; P = .985). There was no difference between groups comparing the improvement from preoperative to 1-year postoperative flexion (RP-F, 5.2°; RP, 4.1°; P = .580). There were 13 patients with postoperative patellar crepitus, with more in the RP-F group (RP-F, 11 patients [16.7%]; RP, 2 patients [3.2%]; P = .017). Owing to these results, coupled with the increased bone resection and higher cost, we no longer routinely use the RP-F design.
Keywords: TKA, high flexion, total knee replacement, rotating platform, range of motion
To access this article, please choose from the options below
The Conflict of Interest statement associated with this article can be found at doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.03.045.
PII: S0883-5403(11)00157-4
doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.03.045
© 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 26, Issue 6, Supplement , Pages 28-34, September 2011
