The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 27, Issue 2 , Pages 193-200.e1, February 2012

To Use or Not to Use Continuous Passive Motion Post–Total Knee Arthroplasty:

Presenting Functional Assessment Results in Early Recovery

Received 10 December 2010; accepted 3 April 2011. published online 13 July 2011.

Abstract 

Continuous passive motion (CPM), though of doubtful value, is yet routinely practiced post–total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We prospectively distributed 84 patients with TKA to 1 of the 3 standard rehabilitation regimes: no-CPM, 1-day-CPM, and 3-day-CPM. We recorded a unique “Timed up and go” test besides pain, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC), short form-12 (SF-12), range of motion, knee and calf swelling, and wound healing parameters. Our standardized and elaborate measurements preoperatively and on postoperative days 3, 5, 14, 42, and 90 showed no statistically significant difference among the 3 groups in each parameter. We concluded that CPM gives no benefit in immediate functional recovery post-TKA, and in fact, the postoperative knee swelling persisted longer. We have since then discontinued its use in our patients without any untoward effect.

Keywords: continuous passive motion, total knee arthroplasty, functional recovery

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The Conflict of Interest statement associated with this article can be found at doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.009.

 Supplementary material available at www.arthroplastyjournal.org.

PII: S0883-5403(11)00168-9

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.009

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 27, Issue 2 , Pages 193-200.e1, February 2012