The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 27, Issue 2 , Pages 253-259.e4, February 2012

Intramedullary Rod and Cement Static Spacer Construct in Chronically Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty

  • Suhel Y. Kotwal, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Chicago, New York, New York
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Suhel Y. Kotwal, MD, University of Chicago, 400 East, 71st Street, Apt # 14V, New York, NY 10021.
  • ,
  • Yasser R. Farid, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
  • ,
  • Suresh S. Patil, MD

      Affiliations

    • Louis A. Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
  • ,
  • Kris J. Alden, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Louis A. Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
  • ,
  • Henry A. Finn, MD, FACS

      Affiliations

    • University of Chicago, Louis A. Weiss Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois

Received 27 August 2010; accepted 17 April 2011. published online 25 July 2011.

Abstract 

Two-stage reimplantation, with interval antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer, is the preferred treatment of prosthetic knee joint infections. In medically compromised hosts with prior failed surgeries, the outcomes are poor. Articulating spacers in such patients render the knee unstable; static spacers have risks of dislocation and extensor mechanism injury. We examined 58 infected total knee arthroplasties with extensive bone and soft tissue loss, treated with resection arthroplasty and intramedullary tibiofemoral rod and antibiotic-laden cement spacer. Thirty-seven patients underwent delayed reimplantation. Most patients (83.8%) were free from recurrent infection at mean follow-up of 29.4 months. Reinfection occurred in 16.2%, which required debridement. Twenty-one patients with poor operative risks remained with the spacer for 11.4 months. All patients, during spacer phase, had brace-free ambulation with simulated tibiofemoral fusion, without bone loss or loss of limb length.

Keywords: antibiotic spacer, prosthetic infection, static spacer, 2-stage reimplantation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The Conflict of Interest statement associated with this article can be found at doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.021

 Supplementary material available at www.arthroplastyjournal.org.

PII: S0883-5403(11)00205-1

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.021

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 27, Issue 2 , Pages 253-259.e4, February 2012