The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 27, Issue 2 , Pages 180-185, February 2012

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Custom Total Knee Cutting Blocks

  • James D. Slover, MD, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: James Slover, MD, MS, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, 301 East 17th Street, Suite 1616, New York, NY 10003.
  • ,
  • Harry E. Rubash, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Henrik Malchau, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Joseph A. Bosco, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York

Received 17 September 2010; accepted 16 April 2011. published online 15 June 2011.

Abstract 

The purposes of this study were to examine the cost-effectiveness of this technology and to determine improvements in patient outcome needed to make custom total knee cutting blocks cost-effective. A Markov decision model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of custom cutting blocks compared with traditional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. The analysis demonstrates routine use of custom cutting blocks for total knee arthroplasty will not be cost-effective unless it results in a significantly reduced revision rate. The reduction necessary increases with increasing costs for the custom blocks. Further research will be necessary to determine if this can be achieved using custom cutting blocks. Patients, surgeons, payers, and institutions should consider this when determining their support of this technology in the absence of supportive data.

Keywords: total knee arthroplasty, custom cutting blocks, cost-effectiveness

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The Conflict of Interest statement associated with this article can be found at doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.023.

PII: S0883-5403(11)00207-5

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.023

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 27, Issue 2 , Pages 180-185, February 2012