The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 27, Issue 6 , Pages 1106-1110, June 2012

Function and Quality of Life in Patients With Recurvatum Deformity After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty:

A Review of Our Joint Registry

Received 13 April 2011; accepted 16 October 2011. published online 12 December 2011.

Abstract 

The aim of this paper is to assess function and quality of life in patients with recurvatum at 2 years after primary total knee arthroplasty. This prospective study involves 2587 total knee arthroplasty from 2004 to 2008 with 2-year follow-up. Patients' demographics, diagnosis, implants, range of motion, laxity, and knee and SF-36 scores were recorded. Recurvatum deformity of 0°, 1° to 5°, 6° to 10°, and more than 10° were classified as grades 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Grade 1 had similar functional scores to grade 0 but significantly better SF1, SF4, SF5, and SF8 when compared with grades 2 and 3. Patients with mediolateral translation of more than 5 mm were more likely to have grades 2 and 3 recurvatum (P = .01), indicating global laxity. Postoperative recurvatum of more than 5° significantly impacts function and quality of life of patients.

Keywords: hyperextension, recurvatum, primary total knee arthroplasty, functional outcome, quality of life, revision for laxity

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The Conflict of Interest statement associated with this article can be found at doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.10.013.

PII: S0883-5403(11)00561-4

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.10.013

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 27, Issue 6 , Pages 1106-1110, June 2012