The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 27, Issue 6 , Pages 1094-1099, June 2012

Sagittal Flexion of the Femoral Component Affects Flexion Gap and Sizing in Total Knee Arthroplasty

  • Tadashi Tsukeoka, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Tadashi Tsukeoka, MD, PhD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba Rehabilitation Center, 1-45-2 Hondacho, Midori-ku, Chiba, Japan.
  • ,
  • Tae Hyun Lee, MD, PhD

Received 21 May 2011; accepted 16 October 2011. published online 09 December 2011.

Abstract 

The purpose of this study was to determine how much sagittal rotation of the femoral component affects the flexion gap and femoral component sizing using a computer-simulation technique. The study comprised 25 knees scheduled for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The femoral component was positioned at −2°, 0°, 2°, 4°, or 6° of flexion to the anterior femoral cortex, and the resected portion of the posterior medial femoral condyle was measured for 3 total knee systems. The amount of the resected bone of the posterior medial condyle decreased approximately 1 mm for every 2° of additional flexion in all TKA systems. Intentional sagittal flexion of the femoral component by several degrees during TKA can be a useful downsizing technique for the femoral component without excessively increasing the flexion gap.

Keywords: sagittal rotation of the femoral component, flexion gap, femoral component sizing, computer-simulation, downsizing

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The Conflict of Interest statement associated with this article can be found at doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.10.015.

PII: S0883-5403(11)00563-8

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.10.015

The Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume 27, Issue 6 , Pages 1094-1099, June 2012